From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based rwlock
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:06:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438612568-28265-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438612568-28265-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
With LLOCK/SCOND, the rwlock counter can be atomically updated w/o need
for a guarding spin lock.
This in turn elides the EXchange instruction based spinning which causes
the cacheline transition to exclusive state and concurrent spinning
across cores would cause the line to keep bouncing around.
LLOCK/SCOND based implementation is superior as spinning on LLOCK keeps
the cacheline in shared state.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
---
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 4f6c90a0a68a..9fd5a0221671 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -75,6 +75,164 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
smp_mb();
}
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
+ */
+
+static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * zero means writer holds the lock exclusively, deny Reader.
+ * Otherwise grant lock to first/subseq reader
+ *
+ * if (rw->counter > 0) {
+ * rw->counter--;
+ * ret = 1;
+ * }
+ */
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brls %[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 1b\n" /* <= 0: spin while write locked */
+ " sub %[val], %[val], 1 \n" /* reader lock */
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brls %[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 4f\n" /* <= 0: already write locked, bail */
+ " sub %[val], %[val], 1 \n" /* counter-- */
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n" /* retry if collided with someone */
+ " mov %[got_it], 1 \n"
+ " \n"
+ "4: ; --- done --- \n"
+
+ : [val] "=&r" (val),
+ [got_it] "+&r" (got_it)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * If reader(s) hold lock (lock < __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ * deny writer. Otherwise if unlocked grant to writer
+ * Hence the claim that Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers.
+ * (can be starved for an indefinite time by readers).
+ *
+ * if (rw->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__) {
+ * rw->counter = 0;
+ * ret = 1;
+ * }
+ */
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brne %[val], %[UNLOCKED], 1b \n" /* while !UNLOCKED spin */
+ " mov %[val], %[WR_LOCKED] \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [UNLOCKED] "ir" (__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brne %[val], %[UNLOCKED], 4f \n" /* !UNLOCKED, bail */
+ " mov %[val], %[WR_LOCKED] \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n" /* retry if collided with someone */
+ " mov %[got_it], 1 \n"
+ " \n"
+ "4: ; --- done --- \n"
+
+ : [val] "=&r" (val),
+ [got_it] "+&r" (got_it)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [UNLOCKED] "ir" (__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * rw->counter++;
+ */
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " add %[val], %[val], 1 \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter))
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ smp_mb();
+
+ rw->counter = __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -148,23 +306,14 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
smp_mb();
}
-#endif
-
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
*
* The spinlock itself is contained in @counter and access to it is
* serialized with @lock_mutex.
- *
- * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
*/
-/* Would read_trylock() succeed? */
-#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter > 0)
-
-/* Would write_trylock() succeed? */
-#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
-
/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
@@ -235,6 +384,11 @@ static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
}
+#endif
+
+#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter > 0)
+#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+
#define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock)
#define arch_write_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_write_lock(lock)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
index 662627ced4f2..4e1ef5f650c6 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ typedef struct {
*/
typedef struct {
volatile unsigned int counter;
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC
arch_spinlock_t lock_mutex;
+#endif
} arch_rwlock_t;
#define __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__ 0x01000000
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 14:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] ARC: spinlocks/atomics rework Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Revert "ARCv2: STAR 9000837815 workaround hardware exclusive transactions livelock" Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARC: refactor atomic inline asm operands with symbolic names Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based spin_lock Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:36 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2015-08-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock/atomics: Delayed retry of failed SCOND with exponential backoff Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock: Reset retry delay when starting a new spin-wait cycle Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] ARC: spinlocks/atomics rework Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438612568-28265-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®