From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sb_edac: fix TAD presence check for sbridge_mci_bind_devs()
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:16:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438798561-10180-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com> (raw)
In 7d375bff, NUM_CHANNELS was changed to 8 and the channel space was
renumerated to handle EN, EP, and EX configurations.
The *_mci_bind_devs functions, except for sbridge_mci_bind_devs(), got a
new device presence check in the form of saw_chan_mask. However,
sbridge_mci_bind_devs() still uses the NUM_CHANNELS for loop.
With the increase in NUM_CHANNELS, this loop fails at index 4 since
SB only has 4 TADs. This results in the following error on SB machines:
EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handle
This patch adapts the saw_chan_mask logic for sbridge_mci_bind_devs() as
well.
After this patch:
EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#0: DEV 0000:3f:0e.0 (POLLED)
EDAC MC1: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller Sandy Bridge Socket#1: DEV 0000:7f:0e.0 (POLLED)
Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
---
drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index ca78311..91cf710 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
{
struct sbridge_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
+ u8 saw_chan_mask = 0;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < sbridge_dev->n_devs; i++) {
@@ -1681,6 +1682,7 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
{
int id = pdev->device - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_TAD0;
pvt->pci_tad[id] = pdev;
+ saw_chan_mask |= 1 << id;
}
break;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_IMC_DDRIO:
@@ -1701,10 +1703,8 @@ static int sbridge_mci_bind_devs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
!pvt-> pci_tad || !pvt->pci_ras || !pvt->pci_ta)
goto enodev;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHANNELS; i++) {
- if (!pvt->pci_tad[i])
- goto enodev;
- }
+ if (saw_chan_mask != 0x0f)
+ goto enodev;
return 0;
enodev:
--
2.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 18:16 Seth Jennings [this message]
2015-08-05 18:20 ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-08-05 19:18 ` Luck, Tony
2015-09-24 17:11 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438798561-10180-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com \
--to=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome