mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] pmem: remove layer when calling arch_has_wmb_pmem()
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:55:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439927741-29580-4-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439927741-29580-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

Prior to this change arch_has_wmb_pmem() was only called by
arch_has_pmem_api().  Both arch_has_wmb_pmem() and arch_has_pmem_api()
checked to make sure that CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API was enabled.

Instead, remove the old arch_has_wmb_pmem() wrapper to be rid of one
extra layer of indirection and the redundant CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API
check. Rename __arch_has_wmb_pmem() to arch_has_wmb_pmem() since we no
longer have a wrapper, and just have arch_has_pmem_api() call the
architecture specific arch_has_wmb_pmem() directly.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h |  2 +-
 include/linux/pmem.h        | 13 +++----------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h
index f43462c..1e8dbb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static inline void arch_wmb_pmem(void)
 	pcommit_sfence();
 }
 
-static inline bool __arch_has_wmb_pmem(void)
+static inline bool arch_has_wmb_pmem(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	/*
diff --git a/include/linux/pmem.h b/include/linux/pmem.h
index c2af613..a0706ea 100644
--- a/include/linux/pmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/pmem.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static inline void arch_wmb_pmem(void)
 	BUG();
 }
 
-static inline bool __arch_has_wmb_pmem(void)
+static inline bool arch_has_wmb_pmem(void)
 {
 	return false;
 }
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void arch_memcpy_to_pmem(void __pmem *dst, const void *src,
 /*
  * Architectures that define ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API must provide
  * implementations for arch_memcpy_to_pmem(), arch_wmb_pmem(), and
- * __arch_has_wmb_pmem().
+ * arch_has_wmb_pmem().
  */
 
 static inline void memcpy_from_pmem(void *dst, void __pmem const *src, size_t size)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline void memunmap_pmem(struct device *dev, void __pmem *addr)
 }
 
 /**
- * arch_has_wmb_pmem - true if wmb_pmem() ensures durability
+ * arch_has_pmem_api - true if wmb_pmem() ensures durability
  *
  * For a given cpu implementation within an architecture it is possible
  * that wmb_pmem() resolves to a nop.  In the case this returns
@@ -60,13 +60,6 @@ static inline void memunmap_pmem(struct device *dev, void __pmem *addr)
  * fall back to a different data consistency model, or otherwise notify
  * the user.
  */
-static inline bool arch_has_wmb_pmem(void)
-{
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API))
-		return __arch_has_wmb_pmem();
-	return false;
-}
-
 static inline bool arch_has_pmem_api(void)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API) && arch_has_wmb_pmem();
-- 
2.1.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-18 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 19:55 [PATCH v5 0/7] dax: I/O path enhancements Ross Zwisler
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] brd: make rd_size static Ross Zwisler
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] pmem, x86: move x86 PMEM API to new pmem.h header Ross Zwisler
2015-08-18 19:55 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] pmem, x86: clean up conditional pmem includes Ross Zwisler
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] pmem: add copy_from_iter_pmem() and clear_pmem() Ross Zwisler
2015-08-19  8:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: update I/O path to do proper PMEM flushing Ross Zwisler
2015-08-18 19:55 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1439927741-29580-4-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome