From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86, bitops, variable_test_bit should return 1 not -1 on a match
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:22:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440440579-7535-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E661604A-0C9E-4C4F-84C3-BDEAEE2E18F3@zytor.com>
This issue was noticed while debugging a CPU hotplug issue. On x86
with (NR_CPUS > 1) the cpu_online() define is cpumask_test_cpu().
cpumask_test_cpu() should return 1 if the cpu is set in cpumask and
0 otherwise.
However, cpumask_test_cpu() returns -1 if the cpu in the cpumask is
set and 0 otherwise. This happens because cpumask_test_cpu() calls
test_bit() which is a define that will call variable_test_bit().
variable_test_bit() calls the assembler instruction sbb (Subtract
with Borrow, " Subtracts the source from the destination, and subtracts 1
extra if the Carry Flag is set. Results are returned in "dest".)
A bit match results in -1 being returned from variable_test_bit() if a
match occurs, not 1 as the function is supposed to.
It looks like the code never does, for example, (test_bit() == 1) so this
change should not have any impact.
[v2]: hpa: Use setc, (Set if Carry, "Sets the byte in the operand to 1 if
the Carry Flag is set, otherwise sets the operand to 0.") instead of !!
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index cfe3b95..c0bff87 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static __always_inline int constant_test_bit(long nr, const volatile unsigned lo
static inline int variable_test_bit(long nr, volatile const unsigned long *addr)
{
- int oldbit;
+ u8 oldbit;
asm volatile("bt %2,%1\n\t"
- "sbb %0,%0"
+ "setc %0"
: "=r" (oldbit)
: "m" (*(unsigned long *)addr), "Ir" (nr));
--
1.7.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 17:18 [PATCH] " Prarit Bhargava
2015-08-21 6:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-21 8:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-08-21 11:53 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-08-24 18:22 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2015-10-07 23:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Prarit Bhargava
2015-10-08 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-08 11:48 ` [PATCH] " Prarit Bhargava
2015-08-21 11:50 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-08-22 9:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440440579-7535-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®