mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: <bp@alien8.de>, <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>, <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Cc: <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:53:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442436811-23382-3-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442436811-23382-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>

For F15h M60h processor, the scrub rate control register has moved
to F2 of PCI config space and is at a different offset from
earlier processors. The minimun recommended scrub rate is also different.
(Refer D18F2x1c8_dct[1:0][DramScrub] on Fam15hM60h BKDG)

Modify the set_scrub_rate() and get_scrub_rate() functions so that
they are aware of these changes.

Fixing couple of indentation issues since I am touching the file.

Tested on F15hM60h, Fam15h Models 00h-0fh and Fam10h systems and
it works fine.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 73aea40..1ec4a13 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline int amd64_read_dct_pci_cfg(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
  * scan the scrub rate mapping table for a close or matching bandwidth value to
  * issue. If requested is too big, then use last maximum value found.
  */
-static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
+static u32 find_scrub_rate(u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate, u32 *scrub_bw)
 {
 	u32 scrubval;
 	int i;
@@ -200,28 +200,52 @@ static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
 	}
 
 	scrubval = scrubrates[i].scrubval;
+	*scrub_bw = scrubval ? scrubrates[i].bandwidth : 0;
 
-	pci_write_bits32(ctl, SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+	return scrubval;
+}
 
-	if (scrubval)
-		return scrubrates[i].bandwidth;
+static inline void __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, int offset,
+				    u32 scrubval)
+{
+	pci_write_bits32(ctl, offset, scrubval, SCRMASK);
 
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
 {
 	struct amd64_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
 	u32 min_scrubrate = 0x5;
+	u32 scrubrate, scrub_bw;
 
 	if (pvt->fam == 0xf)
 		min_scrubrate = 0x0;
+	else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
+		min_scrubrate = 0x6;
 
 	/* Erratum #505 */
 	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
 		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
 
-	return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
+	scrubrate = find_scrub_rate(bw, min_scrubrate, &scrub_bw);
+
+	/* Scrub rate control register moved to F2 register space for
+	 * F15hM60h andit is per DCT now. So, need to select the DCT
+	 * using DCT_CFG_SEL first and then program the scrubrate
+	 */
+	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
+		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+		__set_scrub_rate(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 1);
+		__set_scrub_rate(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+
+		goto scrub_out;
+	}
+
+	__set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+
+scrub_out:
+	return scrub_bw;
 }
 
 static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
@@ -234,9 +258,18 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
 		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
 
-	amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
+		/* Since we mirror the same scrubrate value across
+		 * both DCTs, it is enough to read the value off one of
+		 * the DCT registers.
+		 */
+		f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+		amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+	} else {
+		amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+	}
 
-	scrubval = scrubval & 0x001F;
+	scrubval = scrubval & SCRMASK;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(scrubrates); i++) {
 		if (scrubrates[i].scrubval == scrubval) {
@@ -1316,7 +1349,7 @@ static int f15_m60h_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
  * F16h and F15h model 30h have only limited cs_modes.
  */
 static int f16_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
-				unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
+				   unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
 {
 	WARN_ON(cs_mode > 12);
 
@@ -1666,7 +1699,7 @@ static int f1x_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
 }
 
 static int f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
-					u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel)
+				       u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel)
 {
 	int cs_found = -EINVAL;
 	int num_dcts_intlv = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
index 4bdec75..15c0eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@
 
 #define DCT_SEL_HI			0x114
 
+#define F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL		0x1C8
+
 /*
  * Function 3 - Misc Control
  */
@@ -269,6 +271,7 @@
 #define NBSL_PP_OBS			0x2
 
 #define SCRCTRL				0x58
+#define SCRMASK				0x1F
 
 #define F10_ONLINE_SPARE		0xB0
 #define online_spare_swap_done(pvt, c)	(((pvt)->online_spare >> (1 + 2 * (c))) & 0x1)
-- 
2.5.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-16 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-16 20:53 [PATCH 0/3] Updates to amd64_edac and ghes_edac Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-16 20:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] EDAC, ghes_edac: Remove redundant memory_type array Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-24  9:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-16 20:53 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-09-24  9:18   ` [PATCH 2/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h Borislav Petkov
2015-09-24 16:15     ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-24 16:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-24 16:42         ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-16 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Update copyright and documentation info Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-17  7:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-17 14:35     ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-17 15:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-17 15:33         ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442436811-23382-3-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®