From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/5] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock performance
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:50:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442955044-43895-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> (raw)
v6->v7:
- Removed arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h from patch 1.
- Removed the unconditional PV kick patch as it has been merged
into tip.
- Changed the pvstat_inc() API to add a new condition parameter.
- Added comments and rearrange code in patch 4 to clarify where
lock stealing happened.
- In patch 5, removed the check for pv_wait count when deciding when
to wait early.
- Updated copyrights and email address.
v5->v6:
- Added a new patch 1 to relax the cmpxchg and xchg operations in
the native code path to reduce performance overhead on non-x86
architectures.
- Updated the unconditional PV kick patch as suggested by PeterZ.
- Added a new patch to allow one lock stealing attempt at slowpath
entry point to reduce performance penalty due to lock waiter
preemption.
- Removed the pending bit and kick-ahead patches as they didn't show
any noticeable performance improvement on top of the lock stealing
patch.
- Simplified the adaptive spinning patch as the lock stealing patch
allows more aggressive pv_wait() without much performance penalty
in non-overcommitted VMs.
v4->v5:
- Rebased the patch to the latest tip tree.
- Corrected the comments and commit log for patch 1.
- Removed the v4 patch 5 as PV kick deferment is no longer needed with
the new tip tree.
- Simplified the adaptive spinning patch (patch 6) & improve its
performance a bit further.
- Re-ran the benchmark test with the new patch.
v3->v4:
- Patch 1: add comment about possible racing condition in PV unlock.
- Patch 2: simplified the pv_pending_lock() function as suggested by
Davidlohr.
- Move PV unlock optimization patch forward to patch 4 & rerun
performance test.
v2->v3:
- Moved deferred kicking enablement patch forward & move back
the kick-ahead patch to make the effect of kick-ahead more visible.
- Reworked patch 6 to make it more readable.
- Reverted back to use state as a tri-state variable instead of
adding an additional bistate variable.
- Added performance data for different values of PV_KICK_AHEAD_MAX.
- Add a new patch to optimize PV unlock code path performance.
v1->v2:
- Take out the queued unfair lock patches
- Add a patch to simplify the PV unlock code
- Move pending bit and statistics collection patches to the front
- Keep vCPU kicking in pv_kick_node(), but defer it to unlock time
when appropriate.
- Change the wait-early patch to use adaptive spinning to better
balance the difference effect on normal and over-committed guests.
- Add patch-to-patch performance changes in the patch commit logs.
This patchset tries to improve the performance of both regular and
over-commmitted VM guests. The adaptive spinning patch was inspired
by the "Do Virtual Machines Really Scale?" blog from Sanidhya Kashyap.
Patch 1 relaxes the memory order restriction of atomic operations by
using less restrictive _acquire and _release variants of cmpxchg()
and xchg(). This will reduce performance overhead when ported to other
non-x86 architectures.
Patch 2 optimizes the PV unlock code path performance for x86-64
architecture.
Patch 3 allows the collection of various count data that are useful
to see what is happening in the system. They do add a bit of overhead
when enabled slowing performance a tiny bit.
Patch 4 allows one lock stealing attempt at slowpath entry. This causes
a pretty big performance improvement for over-committed VM guests.
Patch 5 enables adaptive spinning in the queue nodes. This patch
leads to further performance improvement in over-committed guest,
though it is not as big as the previous patch.
Waiman Long (5):
locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code
locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path
locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics
locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt
locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning
arch/x86/Kconfig | 9 +
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 59 +++++
include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 9 +-
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 48 +++--
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 376 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 437 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 20:50 Waiman Long [this message]
2015-09-22 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code Waiman Long
2015-10-13 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 20:38 ` Waiman Long
2015-10-13 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 9:39 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-22 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path Waiman Long
2015-09-22 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long
2015-10-13 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 21:06 ` Waiman Long
2015-09-22 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long
2015-10-13 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 20:41 ` Waiman Long
2015-10-13 20:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-15 20:44 ` Waiman Long
2015-10-13 19:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 20:45 ` Waiman Long
2015-10-13 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 20:50 ` Waiman Long
2015-10-14 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-15 21:01 ` Waiman Long
2015-09-22 20:50 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442955044-43895-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®