From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933361AbbI3TES (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:04:18 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:51761 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932481AbbI3TEP (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:04:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1443639852.1859.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: Rate limiting AP bandwidth change messages in ieee80211_config_bw? From: Johannes Berg To: Josh Boyer Cc: drago01 , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , netdev , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:04:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1443637937.1859.19.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150930_203253_594716_3CF517AD) References: (sfid-20150930_190254_762697_55F052FA) <1443637937.1859.19.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150930_203253_594716_3CF517AD) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I'm not sure ratelimiting it would even work - it's not *that* high > frequency? Not really sure though. > > I think we can do either, it's not such a terribly important message as > far as I can tell. > Seems like Emmanuel would like to see the message stay in some form - perhaps we should try rate limiting it then? Could you check if that actually works? johannes