mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <itai.katz@freescale.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
	<devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>, <german.rivera@freescale.com>,
	<lijun.pan@freescale.com>, <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	<agraf@suse.de>, <bhamciu1@freescale.com>, <R89243@freescale.com>,
	<bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>, <nir.erez@freescale.com>,
	<richard.schmitt@freescale.com>, <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Itai Katz <itai.katz@freescale.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fsl-mc: abstract test for whether a dprc is a root dprc
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 10:09:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443942594-7189-3-git-send-email-itai.katz@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443942594-7189-1-git-send-email-itai.katz@freescale.com>

From: Itai Katz <itai.katz@freescale.com>

Instead of relying on assumptions about fields in data
structures, abstract the test for whether a dprc is a root
dprc into a function.

Signed-off-by: Itai Katz <itai.katz@freescale.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c
index 2aaeb3a..6a6c5a6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
 
 static struct kmem_cache *mc_dev_cache;
 
+static bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct device *dev);
+
 /**
  * fsl_mc_bus_match - device to driver matching callback
  * @dev: the MC object device structure to match against
@@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
 	 * Only exception is the root DPRC, which is a special case.
 	 */
 	if ((mc_dev->obj_desc.state & DPRC_OBJ_STATE_PLUGGED) == 0 &&
-	    &mc_dev->dev != fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root)
+	    !fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc_dev->dev))
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
@@ -215,6 +217,14 @@ bool fsl_mc_bus_exists(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl_mc_bus_exists);
 
+/**
+ * fsl_mc_is_root_dprc - function to check if a given device is a root dprc
+ */
+static bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return dev == fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root;
+}
+
 static int get_dprc_icid(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
 			 int container_id, u16 *icid)
 {
@@ -500,7 +510,7 @@ void fsl_mc_device_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
 			mc_dev->mc_io = NULL;
 		}
 
-		if (&mc_dev->dev == fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root)
+		if (fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc_dev->dev))
 			fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root = NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -726,7 +736,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct fsl_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	if (WARN_ON(&mc->root_mc_bus_dev->dev != fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root))
+	if (WARN_ON(!fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc->root_mc_bus_dev->dev)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	fsl_mc_device_remove(mc->root_mc_bus_dev);
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-04  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-04  7:09 [PATCH 0/5] staging: fsl-mc: multiple root DPRCs itai.katz
2015-10-04  7:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging: fsl-mc: abstract test for existence of fsl-mc bus itai.katz
2015-10-04  7:09 ` itai.katz [this message]
2015-10-06  8:47   ` [PATCH 2/5] staging: fsl-mc: abstract test for whether a dprc is a root dprc Mike Rapoport
2015-10-06 13:39     ` Katz Itai
2015-10-04  7:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging: fsl-mc: add function to return pointer to " itai.katz
2015-10-04  7:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-mc: add counter to track number of root DPRCs itai.katz
2015-10-04  7:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging: fsl-mc: remove references to dev_root itai.katz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1443942594-7189-3-git-send-email-itai.katz@freescale.com \
    --to=itai.katz@freescale.com \
    --cc=R89243@freescale.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhamciu1@freescale.com \
    --cc=bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=german.rivera@freescale.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lijun.pan@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nir.erez@freescale.com \
    --cc=richard.schmitt@freescale.com \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®