mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>,
	John de la Garza <john@jjdev.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rbtree: clarify documentation of rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 2015 18:32:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443997973-1700-1-git-send-email-dev@codyps.com> (raw)

Noticed that commit a20135ffbc44 ("writeback: don't drain
bdi_writeback_congested on bdi destruction") added a usage of
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() in mm/backing-dev.c which appears
to try to rb_erase() elements from an rbtree while iterating over it
using rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe().

Doing this will cause random nodes to be missed by the iteration because
rb_erase() may rebalance the tree, changing the ordering that we're
trying to iterate over.

The previous documentation for rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()
wasn't clear that this wasn't allowed, it was taken from the docs for
list_for_each_entry_safe(), where erasing isn't a problem due to
list_del() not reordering.

Explicitly warn developers about this potential pit-fall.

Note that I haven't fixed the actual issue that (it appears) the commit
referenced above introduced (not familiar enough with that code).

In general (and in this case), the patterns to follow are:
 - switch to rb_first() + rb_erase(), don't use
   rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe().
 - keep the postorder iteration and don't rb_erase() at all. Instead
   just clear the fields of rb_node & cgwb_congested_tree as required by
   other users of those structures.

CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>
---
 include/linux/rbtree.h | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree.h b/include/linux/rbtree.h
index 830c499..39de3df 100644
--- a/include/linux/rbtree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rbtree.h
@@ -101,13 +101,21 @@ static inline void rb_link_node_rcu(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent
 	})
 
 /**
- * rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe - iterate over rb_root in post order of
- * given type safe against removal of rb_node entry
+ * rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe - iterate in post-order over rb_root of
+ * given type allowing the backing memory of @pos to be invalidated
  *
  * @pos:	the 'type *' to use as a loop cursor.
  * @n:		another 'type *' to use as temporary storage
  * @root:	'rb_root *' of the rbtree.
  * @field:	the name of the rb_node field within 'type'.
+ *
+ * This function provides a similar guarantee as list_for_each_entry_safe() and
+ * allows the iteration to continue independent of changes to @pos by the body
+ * of the loop.
+ *
+ * Note, however, that it cannot handle other modifications that re-order the
+ * rbtree it is iterating over. This includes calling rb_erase() on @pos, as
+ * rb_erase() may rebalance the tree, causing us to miss some nodes.
  */
 #define rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, root, field) \
 	for (pos = rb_entry_safe(rb_first_postorder(root), typeof(*pos), field); \
-- 
2.4.9


             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-04 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-04 22:32 Cody P Schafer [this message]
2015-10-06 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2015-10-13 22:14 ` [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: remove broken rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() usage in cgwb_bdi_destroy() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1443997973-1700-1-git-send-email-dev@codyps.com \
    --to=dev@codyps.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john@jjdev.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome