From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] linux/compiler.h: fix stale comment on {READ,WRITE}_ONCE
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:46:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444635981-25552-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
Commit 7bd3e239d6c6 ("locking: Remove atomicy checks from
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE") removed said warning.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index c836eb2dc44d..1dd0034e15e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -237,8 +237,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
* In contrast to ACCESS_ONCE these two macros will also work on aggregate
* data types like structs or unions. If the size of the accessed data
* type exceeds the word size of the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits)
- * READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy and print a
- * compile-time warning.
+ * READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy.
*
* Their two major use cases are: (1) Mediating communication between
* process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
--
2.1.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 7:46 Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2015-10-12 8:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-03-10 0:16 ` [PATCH resend] " Rasmus Villemoes
2016-03-10 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444635981-25552-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®