mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/6] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:52:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445097154-18229-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445097154-18229-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
nr_segment again during merge.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
-					 struct bio_set *bs)
+					 struct bio_set *bs,
+					 unsigned *nsegs)
 {
 	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
 	int alignment;
 	sector_t tmp;
 	unsigned split_sectors;
 
+	*nsegs = 1;
+
 	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
 	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
 
@@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					    struct bio *bio,
-					    struct bio_set *bs)
+					    struct bio_set *bs,
+					    unsigned *nsegs)
 {
+	*nsegs = 1;
+
 	if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
-					 struct bio_set *bs)
+					 struct bio_set *bs,
+					 unsigned *segs)
 {
 	struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
 	struct bvec_iter iter;
@@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
 		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
 	}
 
+	*segs = nsegs;
 	return NULL;
 split:
+	*segs = nsegs;
 	return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
 }
 
 void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
 		     struct bio_set *bs)
 {
-	struct bio *split;
+	struct bio *split, *res;
+	unsigned nsegs;
 
 	if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
-		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
+		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
 	else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
-		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
+		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
 	else
-		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
+		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
+
+	/* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
+	res = split ? split : *bio;
+	res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
+	bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
 
 	if (split) {
 		bio_chain(split, *bio);
-- 
1.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-17 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-17 15:52 [PATCH v1 0/6] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:11   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] block: " Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:27   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-19 15:32     ` Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:46       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] blk-mq: fix for trace_block_plug() Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:38   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-19 15:58     ` Ming Lei
2015-10-19 17:59       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-20  0:38         ` Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:57   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445097154-18229-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®