From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/6] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:52:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445097154-18229-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445097154-18229-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
nr_segment again during merge.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
struct bio *bio,
- struct bio_set *bs)
+ struct bio_set *bs,
+ unsigned *nsegs)
{
unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
int alignment;
sector_t tmp;
unsigned split_sectors;
+ *nsegs = 1;
+
/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
@@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
struct bio *bio,
- struct bio_set *bs)
+ struct bio_set *bs,
+ unsigned *nsegs)
{
+ *nsegs = 1;
+
if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
return NULL;
@@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
struct bio *bio,
- struct bio_set *bs)
+ struct bio_set *bs,
+ unsigned *segs)
{
struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
struct bvec_iter iter;
@@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
}
+ *segs = nsegs;
return NULL;
split:
+ *segs = nsegs;
return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
}
void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
struct bio_set *bs)
{
- struct bio *split;
+ struct bio *split, *res;
+ unsigned nsegs;
if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
- split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
+ split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
- split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
+ split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
else
- split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
+ split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
+
+ /* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
+ res = split ? split : *bio;
+ res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
+ bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
if (split) {
bio_chain(split, *bio);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-17 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-17 15:52 [PATCH v1 0/6] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] block: " Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-19 15:32 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] blk-mq: fix for trace_block_plug() Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:38 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-19 15:58 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-19 17:59 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-20 0:38 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-17 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-19 15:57 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445097154-18229-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com \
--to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®