From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753618AbbJSJci (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:32:38 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:35204 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753188AbbJSJch (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:32:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1445247154.30407.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/prom: Avoid reference to potentially freed memory From: Michael Ellerman To: Christophe JAILLET , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:32:34 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <1444976055-19148-1-git-send-email-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <1444989750.12954.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 16/10/2015 12:02, Michael Ellerman a écrit : > > As the kbuild robot detected you have left an extra "}" here. > > > > I don't mind too much if you send patches that aren't compile tested, but you > > might save yourself some time by compiling them. > > Sorry about it, and thanks for your patience. > IMHO, this should never happen and patches should be at least > compile-tested. Preferably yes. But for these sort of cleanup patches, where you're touching lots of different arches, I realise it can be tedious to find all the various cross compilers. So I'm willing to cut you a bit of slack :) > I will be more careful and compile-test any new patch I submit. Thanks. cheers