From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751358AbbJXEgO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 00:36:14 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:34846 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750794AbbJXEgM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 00:36:12 -0400
Message-ID: <1445661367.3218.62.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
 hierarchy
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 06:36:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <20150824213600.GK28944@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RKCO-yxtVf+iUs8FOqk6uGSyixEXtx9zSzxQ1uOGtkDqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20150824221935.GN28944@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RK08pC3g9qx+TEw6PQvtHk8idKE3OALQN8cFr_QOuT3FA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20150825210234.GE26785@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RJvrPL7S37=yhxMA5OGUFNUfPurTZ21nfH6eFRb15ZGtw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20150912144007.GA8942@htj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RLAtuaDbE9+nvMvgMB8zaOpxVcriCyE9qqszNM3XXTo5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20151001184629.GB26498@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RKx0vT-9VFN=XASYM4iv4U5ZGZW93XRtJd_7mOHwu76NA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 07:21 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:

> It'd be a step back in usability only for users who have been using
> cgroups in fringing ways which can't be justified for ratification and
> we do want to actively filter those out.

Of all the cgroup signal currently in existence, seems the Google signal
has to have the most volume under the curve by a mile.  If you were to
filter that signal out, what remained would be a flat line of noise.

	-Mike