From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:04:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445990693.20657.98.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw9YAcNZDSStidcq8r-Fn7OqMMScrM6Pf=XOmBSC1aq2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
> >
> > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> > machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
> > possible to get one, but difficult to screen-shot (using bare
> > metal, not VM). Also the Oops was seemingly unrelated.
> > And if you run "dosemu -s" under non-KMS console, you'll also
> > reproduce this one:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97321
>
> Hmm. Andrew Morton responded to that initially, but then nothing
> happened, and now it's been another six months. Andrew?
>
> The arch/x86/mm/pat.c error handling does seem to be suspect. This is
> all code several years old, so none of this is new, and I think Suresh
> is gone. Adding a few other people with recent sign-offs to that
> file, in the hope that somebody feels like they own it..
In the case of PFNMAP, the range should always be mapped. So, I wonder why
follow_phys() failed with the !pte_present() check.
Stas, do you have a test program that can reproduce 97321?
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-26 1:25 Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-26 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/signal/64: Add a comment about sigcontext->fs and gs Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-31 15:25 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-12-07 23:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-29 12:24 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-12-29 12:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-26 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-26 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-31 15:18 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-26 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-26 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again Stas Sergeev
2015-10-27 0:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-27 14:05 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-27 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-28 0:04 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-10-28 9:53 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-28 16:34 ` Toshi Kani
2015-10-28 19:22 ` Toshi Kani
2015-10-28 22:51 ` Toshi Kani
2015-10-31 11:58 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-11-02 17:01 ` Toshi Kani
2015-10-30 23:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445990693.20657.98.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=stsp@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome