From: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>, Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix mod-by-zero case
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:43:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446698639-12362-1-git-send-email-zlim.lnx@gmail.com> (raw)
Turns out in the case of modulo by zero in a BPF program:
A = A % X; (X == 0)
the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0.
The bug in JIT is exposed by a new test case [1].
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/4/499
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
---
This patch applies on top of "arm64: bpf: fix fiv-by-zero case" [2].
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/4/25
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 9ae6f23..6217f80 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -269,6 +269,8 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
+ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
{
const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
@@ -281,16 +283,19 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
check_imm26(jmp_offset);
emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
/* else */
- emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
+ switch (BPF_OP(code)) {
+ case BPF_DIV:
+ emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
+ break;
+ case BPF_MOD:
+ ctx->tmp_used = 1;
+ emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx);
+ emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx);
+ emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
+ break;
+ }
break;
}
- case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
- case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
- emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx);
- emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx);
- emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
- break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
emit(A64_LSLV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 4:43 Zi Shen Lim [this message]
2015-11-06 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446698639-12362-1-git-send-email-zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
--to=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®