From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
salyzyn@android.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, ying.xue@windriver.com,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:52:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447267928.3704532.436332953.6FB2A816@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ziyk347o.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 17:12, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, at 22:55, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> >> An AF_UNIX datagram socket being the client in an n:1 association with
> >> some server socket is only allowed to send messages to the server if the
> >> receive queue of this socket contains at most sk_max_ack_backlog
> >> datagrams.
>
> [...]
>
> > This whole patch seems pretty complicated to me.
> >
> > Can't we just remove the unix_recvq_full checks alltogether and unify
> > unix_dgram_poll with unix_poll?
> >
> > If we want to be cautious we could simply make unix_max_dgram_qlen limit
> > the number of skbs which are in flight from a sending socket. The skb
> > destructor can then decrement this. This seems much simpler.
> >
> > Would this work?
>
> In the way this is intended to work, cf
>
> http://marc.info/?t=115627606000002&r=1&w=2
Oh, I see, we don't limit closed but still referenced sockets. This
actually makes sense on how fd handling is implemented, just as a range
check.
Have you checked if we can somehow deregister the socket in the poll
event framework? You wrote that it does not provide such a function but
maybe it would be easy to add?
Thanks,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 11:07 Use-after-free " Dmitry Vyukov
2015-10-12 12:02 ` Michal Kubecek
2015-10-12 12:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-12 12:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-06 13:06 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-06 14:58 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-06 15:15 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-09 14:40 ` [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free " Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-09 18:25 ` David Miller
2015-11-10 17:16 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-09 22:44 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-10 17:38 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-22 21:43 ` alternate queueing mechanism (was: [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue) Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-10 21:55 ` [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-11 12:28 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-11-11 16:12 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-11 18:52 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2015-11-13 19:06 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-11 17:35 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-12 19:11 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-13 18:51 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-13 22:17 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-15 18:32 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-17 16:08 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-17 18:38 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-16 22:15 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-16 22:28 ` [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue (w/ Fixes:) Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-17 16:13 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-17 20:14 ` David Miller
2015-11-17 21:37 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-17 22:09 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-19 23:48 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-17 22:48 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-18 18:15 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-18 23:39 ` more statistics (was: [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue (w/ Fixes:)) Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-19 23:52 ` [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue (w/ Fixes:) Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-20 16:03 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-20 16:21 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-20 22:07 ` [PATCH] unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-23 16:21 ` Jason Baron
2015-11-23 17:30 ` David Miller
2015-11-23 21:37 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-11-23 23:06 ` Rainer Weikusat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447267928.3704532.436332953.6FB2A816@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jln@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com \
--cc=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®