[PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng: Fixed more comments

["Gavin O'Leary" <gavinoleary3@gmail.com>]

Fixed more comment issues

Signed-off-by: Gavin O'Leary <gavinoleary3@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
index 2d9b42f..86acbcd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
@@ -239,7 +239,9 @@ static int prism2_del_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 	int result = 0;
 
 	/* There is no direct way in the hardware (AFAIK) of removing
-	   a key, so we will cheat by setting the key to a bogus value */
+	 * a key, so we will cheat by setting the key to a bogus value
+	 */
+
 	/* send key to driver */
 	switch (key_index) {
 	case 0:
@@ -562,8 +564,9 @@ static int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 		}
 
 		/* Assume we should set privacy invoked and exclude unencrypted
-		   We could possibly use sme->privacy here, but the assumption
-		   seems reasonable anyway */
+		 * We could possible use sme->privacy here, but the assumption
+		 * seems reasonable anyways
+		 */
 		result = prism2_domibset_uint32(wlandev,
 						DIDmib_dot11smt_dot11PrivacyTable_dot11PrivacyInvoked,
 						P80211ENUM_truth_true);
@@ -578,7 +581,8 @@ static int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 
 	} else {
 		/* Assume we should unset privacy invoked
-		   and exclude unencrypted */
+		 * and exclude unencrypted
+		 */
 		result = prism2_domibset_uint32(wlandev,
 						DIDmib_dot11smt_dot11PrivacyTable_dot11PrivacyInvoked,
 						P80211ENUM_truth_false);
-- 
2.5.0