From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755571AbbKWVcV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:32:21 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:43993 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753322AbbKWVcR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:32:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1448314314.15591.1.camel@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/61] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.4 From: Khalid Aziz To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , David Miller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Wei Yang , TJ , Yijing Wang , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:31:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1445979353-1728-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <5633E570.6040906@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 18:53 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote: > > > > I applied patches 1-8 and 11-16 to 4.3.0-rc7 to test on sparc platforms. I > > am seeing a "can't claim BAR" message on a T4: > > > > pci 0000:04:00.0: can't claim BAR 6 [mem 0x84000000000-0x8400000ffff]: > > address conflict with 0000:04:00.0 [mem 0x84000000000-0x840007fffff] > > PCI: scan_bus[/pci@400/pci@1/pci@0/pci@0/pci@0] bus no 4 > * /pci@400/pci@1/pci@0/pci@0/pci@0/display@0 > create device, devfn: 0, type: display > class: 0x30000 device name: 0000:04:00.0 > parse addresses (80 bytes) @ fff8001fffe34f40 > start: 84000000000, end: 840007fffff, i: 10 > start: 84000800000, end: 8400081ffff, i: 14 > start: 85100000000, end: 8510000007f, i: 18 > start: 84000000000, end: 8400000ffff, i: 30 > > so the BAR 6 the ROM bar is overlapping with BAR0. > and the ROM bar get rejected. > > Looks like only the device BAR6 is not assigned form OF? > Hi Yinghai, Any progress on this? Do you need any more information from me? Thanks, Khalid