From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: no longer make CPU targets visible separately
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:32:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448469143-447355-9-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448469143-447355-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Now that realview and integrator always select the correct CPU
type themselves based on the core tiles, there is no need to
still have them user-visible in arch/arm/mm/Kconfig. The
ARM925T symbol has been selected by the only user for many
years, so that can be removed along with the realview and
integrator specific ones.
This also solves randconfig build problems on realview.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index 76f65f2d59b1..549f6d3aec5b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ config CPU_ARM7TDMI
# ARM720T
config CPU_ARM720T
- bool "Support ARM720T processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V4T && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ config CPU_ARM720T
# ARM740T
config CPU_ARM740T
- bool "Support ARM740T processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V4T && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
depends on !MMU
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ config CPU_ARM9TDMI
# ARM920T
config CPU_ARM920T
- bool "Support ARM920T processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V4T && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ config CPU_ARM920T
# ARM922T
config CPU_ARM922T
- bool "Support ARM922T processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V4T && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config CPU_ARM922T
# ARM925T
config CPU_ARM925T
- bool "Support ARM925T processor" if ARCH_OMAP1
+ bool
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ config CPU_ARM925T
# ARM926T
config CPU_ARM926T
- bool "Support ARM926T processor" if (!ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || ARCH_MULTI_V5) && (ARCH_INTEGRATOR || MACH_REALVIEW_EB)
+ bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5TJ
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ config CPU_FA526
# ARM940T
config CPU_ARM940T
- bool "Support ARM940T processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V4T && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
depends on !MMU
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ config CPU_ARM940T
# ARM946E-S
config CPU_ARM946E
- bool "Support ARM946E-S processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V5 && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
depends on !MMU
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ config CPU_ARM946E
# ARM1020 - needs validating
config CPU_ARM1020
- bool "Support ARM1020T (rev 0) processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V5 && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ config CPU_ARM1020
# ARM1020E - needs validating
config CPU_ARM1020E
- bool "Support ARM1020E processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V5 && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
depends on n
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ config CPU_ARM1020E
# ARM1022E
config CPU_ARM1022
- bool "Support ARM1022E processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V5 && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ config CPU_ARM1022
# ARM1026EJ-S
config CPU_ARM1026
- bool "Support ARM1026EJ-S processor" if (ARCH_MULTI_V5 && ARCH_INTEGRATOR)
+ bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T # But need Jazelle, but EV5TJ ignores bit 10
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ config CPU_PJ4B
# ARMv6
config CPU_V6
- bool "Support ARM V6 processor" if (!ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || ARCH_MULTI_V6) && (ARCH_INTEGRATOR || MACH_REALVIEW_EB || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX)
+ bool
select CPU_32v6
select CPU_ABRT_EV6
select CPU_CACHE_V6
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ config CPU_V6
# ARMv6k
config CPU_V6K
- bool "Support ARM V6K processor" if (!ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || ARCH_MULTI_V6) && (ARCH_INTEGRATOR || MACH_REALVIEW_EB || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX)
+ bool
select CPU_32v6
select CPU_32v6K
select CPU_ABRT_EV6
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ config CPU_V6K
# ARMv7
config CPU_V7
- bool "Support ARM V7 processor" if (!ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || ARCH_MULTI_V7) && (ARCH_INTEGRATOR || MACH_REALVIEW_EB || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX)
+ bool
select CPU_32v6K
select CPU_32v7
select CPU_ABRT_EV7
--
2.1.0.rc2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 16:32 [PATCH 00/10] ARM: realview multiplatform Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: realview: remove sparsemem hack Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 02/10] ARM: realview: don't map undefined PCI registers Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 03/10] clk/realview: stop using machine headers Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: no longer force unbuffered DMA for realview Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 05/10] ARM: realview: remove private barrier implementation Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-10 9:09 ` Linus Walleij
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: realview: enable multiplatform Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-10 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-10 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 07/10] ARM: integrator: use explicit core module options Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-25 16:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: realview: make all header files local Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-10 10:06 ` Linus Walleij
2015-11-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: realview: clean up header files Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448469143-447355-9-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®