From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86, mtrr: mark range_new in mtrr_calc_range_state() as __initdata
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:44:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449002691-20783-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151201161432.GB2441@gmail.com>
range_new doesn't seem to be used after init. It is only passed to
memset, sum_ranges, memcmp and x86_get_mtrr_mem_range, the latter of
which also only passes it on to various *range* library functions. So
mark it __initdata to free up an extra page after init.
Its contents are wiped at every call to mtrr_calc_range_state(), so it
being static is not about preserving state between calls, but simply
to avoid a 4k+ stack frame. While there, add a comment explaining this
and why it's safe.
We could also mark nr_range_new as __initdata, but since it's just a
single int and also doesn't carry state between calls (it is
unconditionally assigned to before it is read), we might as well make
it an ordinary automatic variable.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
Something like this, perhaps?
v2: Add comment on range_new, per Ingo.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
index 70d7c93f4550..0d98503c2245 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
@@ -593,9 +593,16 @@ mtrr_calc_range_state(u64 chunk_size, u64 gran_size,
unsigned long x_remove_base,
unsigned long x_remove_size, int i)
{
- static struct range range_new[RANGE_NUM];
+ /*
+ * range_new should really be an automatic variable, but
+ * putting 4096 bytes on the stack is frowned upon, to put it
+ * mildly. It is safe to make it a static __initdata variable,
+ * since mtrr_calc_range_state is only called during init and
+ * there's no way it will call itself recursively.
+ */
+ static struct range range_new[RANGE_NUM] __initdata;
unsigned long range_sums_new;
- static int nr_range_new;
+ int nr_range_new;
int num_reg;
/* Convert ranges to var ranges state: */
--
2.6.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 9:47 [PATCH] " Rasmus Villemoes
2015-11-27 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 11:58 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-12-01 16:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 20:44 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2015-12-04 11:49 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/mtrr: Mark the 'range_new' static variable " tip-bot for Rasmus Villemoes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449002691-20783-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®