From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
Cc: kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ath6kl@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v2] ath6kl: Use vmalloc to allocate ar->fw for api1 method
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 05:20:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449062433.32764.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449029898-15209-1-git-send-email-motobud@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 22:18 -0600, Brent Taylor wrote:
> Since commit 8437754c8335 ("ath6kl: Use vmalloc instead of kmalloc for
> fw") ar->fw is expected to be pointing to memory allocated by vmalloc.
> If the api1 method (via ath6kl_fetch_fw_api1) is used to allocate memory
> for ar->fw, then kmemdup is used. This patch checks if the firmware being
> loaded is the 'fw' image, then use vmalloc, otherwise use kmalloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix commit message and code formatting (use tab instaed of spaces)
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> index 6ae0734..4f16bd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c
> @@ -673,10 +673,15 @@ static int ath6kl_get_fw(struct ath6kl *ar, const char *filename,
> return ret;
>
> *fw_len = fw_entry->size;
> - *fw = kmemdup(fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (&ar->fw == fw)
> + *fw = vmalloc(fw_entry->size);
> + else
> + *fw = kmalloc(fw_entry->size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (*fw == NULL)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> + else
> + memcpy(*fw, fw_entry->data, fw_entry->size);
>
> release_firmware(fw_entry);
>
This looks very odd.
Why not using kvfree() in ath6kl_core_cleanup() ?
If you switch to vmalloc() here because the kmemdup() was potentially
failing, then the changelog should say it !
Using vmalloc() instead of kmalloc() should be driven by the allocation
size, not the legacy code doing the freeing.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 4:18 Brent Taylor
2015-12-02 13:20 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449062433.32764.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ath6kl@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=motobud@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®