mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: isdn@linux-pingi.de, davem@davemloft.net,
	gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: gigaset: freeing an active object
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:31:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449408690.2515.15.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F8341.7010704@hurleysoftware.com>

On wo, 2015-12-02 at 18:48 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 01:01 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Should (something like) this go into stable too?
> 
> Definitely for stable since it has a userspace triggerable component.

Thanks, will do.

> > --- a/drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser-gigaset.c
> > +++ b/drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser-gigaset.c
> > @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(cidmode, "stay in CID mode when
> > idle");
> >  
> >  static struct gigaset_driver *driver;
> >  
> > +static struct platform_device pdev;
> > +
> >  struct ser_cardstate {
> > -	struct platform_device	dev;
> >  	struct tty_struct	*tty;
> >  	atomic_t		refcnt;
> >  	struct completion	dead_cmp;
> > @@ -370,8 +371,8 @@ static void gigaset_freecshw(struct cardstate
> > *cs)
> >  	tasklet_kill(&cs->write_tasklet);
> >  	if (!cs->hw.ser)
> >  		return;
> > -	dev_set_drvdata(&cs->hw.ser->dev.dev, NULL);
> > -	platform_device_unregister(&cs->hw.ser->dev);
> > +	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev.dev, NULL);
> > +	platform_device_unregister(&pdev);
> >  	kfree(cs->hw.ser);
> 
> Tilman,
> 
> Is there a 1:1 correspondence and lifetime for the embedded platform
> device and it's containing memory?

(Haven't heard from Tilman, so I'll give this a try.)

That containing memory is a struct ser_cardstate. And currently
instances of struct _ser_cardstate are malloced and freed in routines
that also call platform_device_register() and
platform_device_unregister(). So yes, I think there's a 1:1
correspondence.

> I ask because the typical approach for device teardown is to put the
> kfree() in the release method;

(Side note: the (struct device) release method of this driver 
-gigaset_device_release() - is actually a nop. It only frees device
->platform_data and platform_device->resource, but neither are actually
used: they remain NULL through their entire life.)

>  naturally, that won't work if there
> is some other lifetime issue.

I'm not sure I follow what you mean here. Could you point me at a driver
that uses that approach, so that I can have a look at it?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-06 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-27 15:19 Sasha Levin
2015-11-27 17:57 ` Paul Bolle
2015-11-27 18:15   ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-28  0:28     ` Paul Bolle
2015-11-28  1:20       ` Peter Hurley
2015-11-28  1:27         ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-29 14:36           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-29 15:30 ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-11-29 18:22   ` Peter Hurley
2015-11-29 18:38     ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-11-29 18:47     ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-11-29 20:26       ` Paul Bolle
2015-11-29 23:23         ` Paul Bolle
2015-11-30 18:01           ` Paul Bolle
2015-11-30 18:30             ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-11-30 21:07               ` Paul Bolle
2015-12-01  9:30                 ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-12-01 10:05                   ` Paul Bolle
2015-12-02 23:48             ` Peter Hurley
2015-12-06 13:31               ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-12-06 15:29                 ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-12-06 20:12                   ` Paul Bolle
2015-12-07  9:27                     ` Tilman Schmidt
2015-12-07 12:25                       ` Paul Bolle
2015-12-07 18:40                         ` Tilman Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449408690.2515.15.camel@tiscali.nl \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=isdn@linux-pingi.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®