From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/8] documentation: Composability analogies
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:14:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449702902-2520-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151209231426.GA2241@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit expands on RCU's composability by comparing it to that of
transactional memory and of locking.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++++++
Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
index cc5b587c0ec5..105247149975 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
@@ -1495,6 +1495,14 @@ section, neither of which is conducive to a long-lived and prosperous
kernel.
<p>
+It is worth noting that RCU is not alone in limiting composability.
+For example, many transactional-memory implementations prohibit
+composing a pair of transactions separated by an irrevocable
+operation (for example, a network receive operation).
+For another example, lock-based critical sections can be composed
+surprisingly freely, but only if deadlock is avoided.
+
+<p>
In short, although RCU read-side critical sections are highly composable,
care is required in some situations, just as is the case for any other
composable synchronization mechanism.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx
index 23524d75a3c3..5b76e21fa092 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx
@@ -1654,6 +1654,14 @@ section, neither of which is conducive to a long-lived and prosperous
kernel.
<p>
+It is worth noting that RCU is not alone in limiting composability.
+For example, many transactional-memory implementations prohibit
+composing a pair of transactions separated by an irrevocable
+operation (for example, a network receive operation).
+For another example, lock-based critical sections can be composed
+surprisingly freely, but only if deadlock is avoided.
+
+<p>
In short, although RCU read-side critical sections are highly composable,
care is required in some situations, just as is the case for any other
composable synchronization mechanism.
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-09 23:14 [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 0/8] Documentation updates for 4.5 Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/8] documentation: Record RCU requirements Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/8] Documentation: Record bottom-bit-zero guarantee for ->next Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/8] documentation: Cover requirements controlling stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-12-09 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/8] documentation: Expand on scheduler/RCU deadlock requirements Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/8] documentation: Clarify RCU memory barriers and requirements Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 7/8] documentation: Update RCU requirements based on expedited changes Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-09 23:15 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 8/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Fix ACCESS_ONCE thinko Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449702902-2520-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome