From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965419AbbLOSgm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:36:42 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:25750 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933669AbbLOSgj (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:36:39 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,433,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="872109693" Message-ID: <1450204599.3057.40.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] crypto: AES CBC multi-buffer glue code From: Tim Chen To: Herbert Xu Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "David S.Miller" , Stephan Mueller , Chandramouli Narayanan , Vinodh Gopal , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , Jussi Kivilinna , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:36:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20151212054806.GG17504@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1449086565.22260.15.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151209025242.GA24861@gondor.apana.org.au> <1449681794.22260.58.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151210014519.GA31692@gondor.apana.org.au> <1449765585.3057.9.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151211032340.GC10399@gondor.apana.org.au> <1449852880.3057.15.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151212054806.GG17504@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 13:48 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:54:40AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > Direct call I assume have less overhead. Let me think about > > static inline int crypto_ablkcipher_encrypt(struct ablkcipher_request *req) > { > struct ablkcipher_tfm *crt = > crypto_ablkcipher_crt(crypto_ablkcipher_reqtfm(req)); > return crt->encrypt(req); > } > > I don't see any overhead there that you could eliminate by calling > crt->encrypt directly. > > Cheers, Okay, I'll attempt to convert the inner cipher to ablk. It may take me a bit of time. Thanks. Tim