From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752762AbcADQP1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:15:27 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0040.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.40]:59739 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752020AbcADQPW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:15:22 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: X-HE-Tag: snail54_10bdd62104508 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2800 Message-ID: <1451924114.4334.85.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers From: Joe Perches To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Cc : Andy Whitcroft" , Peter Zijlstra , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Cooper , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stefano Stabellini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Miller , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar , Tony Lindgren , Andrey Konovalov Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 08:15:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20160104161123.GJ19062@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1451907395-15978-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1451907395-15978-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1451923660.4334.83.camel@perches.com> <20160104161123.GJ19062@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 16:11 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:07:40AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:36 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > + my $all_barriers = join('|', (@barriers, @smp_barriers)); > > > + > > > + if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\(/) { > > > > It would be better to use /\b$all_barriers\s*\(/ > > as there's no reason for the capture and there > > could be a space between the function and the > > open parenthesis. > > I think you mean > > /\b(?:$all_barriers)\s*\(/ > > as 'all_barriers' will be: > > mb|wmb|rmb|smp_mb|smp_wmb|smp_rmb > > and putting that into your suggestion results in: > > /\bmb|wmb|rmb|smp_mb|smp_wmb|smp_rmb\s*\(/ > > which is clearly wrong - the \b only applies to 'mb' and the \s*\( only > applies to smp_rmb. right, thanks.