From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753659AbcAEU3x (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:29:53 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:44948 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162AbcAETrV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:47:21 -0500 From: Kamal Mostafa To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Eduardo Valentin , Kamal Mostafa Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 083/211] thermal: exynos: Fix unbalanced regulator disable on probe failure Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:43:11 -0800 Message-Id: <1452023119-25647-84-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1452023119-25647-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> References: <1452023119-25647-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 4.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.2.8-ckt1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Krzysztof Kozlowski commit 824ead03b78403a21449cb7eb153a4344cd3b4c8 upstream. During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of regulator enable/disable. The patch moves code for getting and enabling the regulator from exynos_map_dt_data() to probe function because it is really not a part of getting Device Tree properties. Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Fixes: 5f09a5cbd14a ("thermal: exynos: Disable the regulator on probe failure") Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa --- drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index af68d06..e39265b 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c @@ -1169,27 +1169,10 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev) struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata; struct resource res; - int ret; if (!data || !pdev->dev.of_node) return -ENODEV; - /* - * Try enabling the regulator if found - * TODO: Add regulator as an SOC feature, so that regulator enable - * is a compulsory call. - */ - data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu"); - if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) { - ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n"); - return ret; - } - } else { - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n"); - } - data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl"); if (data->id < 0) data->id = 0; @@ -1313,6 +1296,23 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pr_err("thermal: tz: %p ERROR\n", data->tzd); return PTR_ERR(data->tzd); } + + /* + * Try enabling the regulator if found + * TODO: Add regulator as an SOC feature, so that regulator enable + * is a compulsory call. + */ + data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu"); + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) { + ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n"); + return ret; + } + } else { + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n"); + } + ret = exynos_map_dt_data(pdev); if (ret) goto err_sensor; -- 1.9.1