From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932093AbcAJAP2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:15:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:54511 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756527AbcAJAPZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:15:25 -0500 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong memory condition check Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 16:15:22 -0800 Message-Id: <1452384922-26144-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch fixes wrong decision for avaliable_free_memory. The return valus is already set as false, so we should consider true condition below only. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index c091b75..342597a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type) sizeof(struct extent_node)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1); } else { - if (sbi->sb->s_bdi->wb.dirty_exceeded) - return false; + if (!sbi->sb->s_bdi->wb.dirty_exceeded) + return true; } return res; } -- 2.6.3