From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933257AbcASWEr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:04:47 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50655 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933044AbcASWEk (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:04:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1453241053.3734.38.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 From: Ben Hutchings To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:04:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160119220050.GE321@x4> References: <20160119213213.GB2637@decadent.org.uk> <20160119214018.GD321@x4> <20160119215848.GH2637@decadent.org.uk> <20160119220050.GE321@x4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FQgYb9ztbwQUyNENCP/c" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.247 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-FQgYb9ztbwQUyNENCP/c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 23:00 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.01.19 at 21:58 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > gcc 6 warns about various things in tools/perf=C2=A0=C2=A0and with = -Werror > > > > these turn into build failures.=C2=A0=C2=A0One of them is a real th= ough not > > > > very serious bug. > > >=20 > > > I've already send patches for 1,2 and 4. See: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460 > > >=20 > > > Not sure what happened with them. Also your patch number 4 is wrong, = you > > > should just delete the semicolon. > >=20 > > I think that the busy-wait, intentional or not, may be a necessary > > part of the test case. >=20 > Well, the author of the code thinks otherwise: >=20 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/269 Oh I see, thanks. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Horngren's Observation: Among economists, the real world is often a special case= . --=-FQgYb9ztbwQUyNENCP/c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUAVp6y3ee/yOyVhhEJAQpJYQ//eLX3ZMg0S/Vwp2RKMYo7FXp3Q5oc9FwE A2p+Stt+gCu9Ac28W6w/7mlBrTs4VPJNMGKnKEFh6UDVrCqs9xsDP8mMxt5/thek /63dXsKyWZrrahQrcY0rkVIvPbcw+OsN6iMTtDgF/rM5XUdF2SfqAOvFDJqO7TKU gg/UnUzWAseX6Cky/0IsvGdTqBiu/wqr5ysbeaIUoMxLVHnHAMtN5yRAe+U6Eopm sDGm70wkns1H80kVXpvK3s30dMqJpWS+OqfKsK+oj3r/wHh4bKb980d+3gnnFNk3 V6vP6uP1WoStu3SLlBVGoUNpIgENkTnC1307R+BFVH2oqNHgnN/F7C/8xIF53vI5 wguGyq8Nr8HAz4la83I60s68jSDj7eoHsWL/3Y8OpPEUtMgw8sbCnYZZIrkjGyWB SaS96CjKYiWuEjpF6F2d0jQOE9uc6UfhzAdRsehfqV6TX8aPKjc6FciBBtthaNs2 EuK3O2NdmG3EEOVi5NaUUGboJR19Jkd2c/D1UMfjn5EBHU9JGEMzPAg4hTUAjCIC ndvWgUcx/L3YhfsLEze7vrAKs134ZCKJSsdwxief6omLKfiTVARfx+zFyj0k0K5a GUVRVhBOSGLWBSA8xHSLbzaOQn8jen6+hv8VGfxkyF+/FaH00GR48dOZdVzXXu0e 3wMAOQZfi7c= =lW1V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FQgYb9ztbwQUyNENCP/c--