From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>,
"Steve Capper" <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Robert Richter" <rrichter@cavium.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/12] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:39:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453541967-3744-7-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453541967-3744-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com>
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Add function needed for cpu to node mapping, and enable
ACPI based NUMA for ARM64 in Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/numa.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index d6d5749..31875ab 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ config ACPI_THERMAL
config ACPI_NUMA
bool "NUMA support"
depends on NUMA
- depends on (X86 || IA64)
+ depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM64)
default y if IA64_GENERIC || IA64_SGI_SN2
config ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
index 2de6068..4728525 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -167,6 +167,18 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
}
break;
+ case ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY:
+ {
+ struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *p =
+ (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header;
+ pr_debug("SRAT Processor (acpi id[0x%04x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
+ p->acpi_processor_uid,
+ p->proximity_domain,
+ (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED) ?
+ "enabled" : "disabled");
+ }
+ break;
+
default:
pr_warn("Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
header->type);
@@ -252,6 +264,24 @@ acpi_parse_processor_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
return 0;
}
+static int __init
+acpi_parse_gicc_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *processor_affinity;
+
+ processor_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header;
+ if (!processor_affinity)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
+
+ /* let architecture-dependent part to do it */
+ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(processor_affinity);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __initdata parsed_numa_memblks;
static int __init
@@ -296,6 +326,9 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
{
int cnt = 0;
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/*
* Should not limit number with cpu num that is from NR_CPUS or nr_cpus=
* SRAT cpu entries could have different order with that in MADT.
@@ -308,6 +341,8 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, 0);
acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_processor_affinity, 0);
+ acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY,
+ acpi_parse_gicc_affinity, 0);
cnt = acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 574d829..e386ae2 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -168,10 +168,25 @@ int acpi_table_parse_madt(enum acpi_madt_type id,
int acpi_parse_mcfg (struct acpi_table_header *header);
void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt);
-/* the following four functions are architecture-dependent */
+/* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */
void acpi_numa_slit_init (struct acpi_table_slit *slit);
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
void acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa);
+#else
+static inline void
+acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa) { }
+#endif
+
void acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+void acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa);
+#else
+static inline void
+acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
+#endif
+
int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-23 9:39 [PATCH v3 00/12] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] acpi, numa: introduce ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 10:25 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-24 4:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Hanjun Guo
2016-01-25 10:21 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-27 7:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-27 14:01 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-28 3:16 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-02-01 18:09 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-02 11:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-02-02 17:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-02 14:10 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-03-02 14:10 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-03-02 14:08 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-03-10 9:50 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2016-01-29 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 Robert Richter
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to common place Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() Hanjun Guo
2016-01-25 9:34 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-27 6:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-09 12:27 ` Robert Richter
2016-03-10 10:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to common place Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 Hanjun Guo
2016-01-23 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] acpi, numa: reuse acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Hanjun Guo
2016-01-25 10:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-27 6:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-27 14:18 ` Robert Richter
2016-01-28 2:48 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-28 13:31 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453541967-3744-7-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome