From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com>,
linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using the simpler composite clk
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:15:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453727747-23307-12-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453727747-23307-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org>
sun8i-a23-mbus-clk used sunxi's factors clk, which is nice for very
complicated clocks, but is not really needed here.
Convert sun8i-a23-mbus-clk to use clk_composite, as it is a gate + mux
+ divider. This makes the code easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
This patch I'm not so sure about. As stated in the cover letter,
this rewrite actually increases the LoC, but possibly making it
easier to understand.
---
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c
index 78683f02a37d..d3e385337b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-mbus.c
@@ -15,68 +15,98 @@
*/
#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include "clk-factors.h"
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_ENABLE 31
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_MUX_SHIFT 24
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_MUX_MASK 0x3
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_DIV_SHIFT 0
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_DIV_WIDTH 3
+#define SUN8I_MBUS_MAX_PARENTS 4
-/**
- * sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors() - calculates m factor for MBUS clocks
- * MBUS rate is calculated as follows
- * rate = parent_rate / (m + 1);
- */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun8i_a23_mbus_lock);
-static void sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors(struct factors_request *req)
+static void __init sun8i_a23_mbus_setup(struct device_node *node)
{
- u8 div;
+ int num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
+ const char *parents[num_parents];
+ const char *clk_name = node->name;
+ struct resource res;
+ struct clk_divider *div;
+ struct clk_gate *gate;
+ struct clk_mux *mux;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ void __iomem *reg;
+ int err;
- /*
- * These clocks can only divide, so we will never be able to
- * achieve frequencies higher than the parent frequency
- */
- if (req->rate > req->parent_rate)
- req->rate = req->parent_rate;
+ reg = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, of_node_full_name(node));
+ if (!reg) {
+ pr_err("Could not get registers for sun8i-mbus-clk\n");
+ return;
+ }
- div = DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
+ div = kzalloc(sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!div)
+ goto err_unmap;
- if (div > 8)
- div = 8;
+ mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mux)
+ goto err_free_div;
- req->rate = req->parent_rate / div;
- req->m = div - 1;
-}
+ gate = kzalloc(sizeof(*gate), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gate)
+ goto err_free_mux;
-static struct clk_factors_config sun8i_a23_mbus_config = {
- .mshift = 0,
- .mwidth = 3,
-};
+ of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
+ of_clk_parent_fill(node, parents, num_parents);
-static const struct factors_data sun8i_a23_mbus_data __initconst = {
- .enable = 31,
- .mux = 24,
- .muxmask = BIT(1) | BIT(0),
- .table = &sun8i_a23_mbus_config,
- .getter = sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors,
-};
+ gate->reg = reg;
+ gate->bit_idx = SUN8I_MBUS_ENABLE;
+ gate->lock = &sun8i_a23_mbus_lock;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun8i_a23_mbus_lock);
+ div->reg = reg;
+ div->shift = SUN8I_MBUS_DIV_SHIFT;
+ div->width = SUN8I_MBUS_DIV_WIDTH;
+ div->lock = &sun8i_a23_mbus_lock;
-static void __init sun8i_a23_mbus_setup(struct device_node *node)
-{
- struct clk *mbus;
- void __iomem *reg;
+ mux->reg = reg;
+ mux->shift = SUN8I_MBUS_MUX_SHIFT;
+ mux->mask = SUN8I_MBUS_MUX_MASK;
+ mux->lock = &sun8i_a23_mbus_lock;
- reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
- if (!reg) {
- pr_err("Could not get registers for a23-mbus-clk\n");
- return;
- }
+ clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, clk_name, parents, num_parents,
+ &mux->hw, &clk_mux_ops,
+ &div->hw, &clk_divider_ops,
+ &gate->hw, &clk_gate_ops,
+ 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ goto err_free_gate;
- mbus = sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun8i_a23_mbus_data,
- &sun8i_a23_mbus_lock, reg);
+ err = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_unregister_clk;
/* The MBUS clocks needs to be always enabled */
- __clk_get(mbus);
- clk_prepare_enable(mbus);
+ __clk_get(clk);
+ clk_prepare_enable(clk);
+
+ return;
+
+err_unregister_clk:
+ clk_unregister_composite(clk);
+err_free_gate:
+ kfree(gate);
+err_free_mux:
+ kfree(mux);
+err_free_div:
+ kfree(div);
+err_unmap:
+ iounmap(reg);
+ of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
+ release_mem_region(res.start, resource_size(&res));
}
CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_mbus, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-mbus-clk", sun8i_a23_mbus_setup);
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 13:15 [PATCH RFC 00/11] clk: sunxi: factors clk clean up and refactor Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] clk: composite: Add unregister function Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Make struct clk_factors_config table const Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Add clk cleanup in sunxi_factors_register() error path Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Add unregister function Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 18:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] clk: sunxi: unmap registers in sunxi_factors_clk_setup if register call fails Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 15:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Consolidate get_factors parameters into a struct Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Support custom formulas Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] clk: sunxi: factors: Drop round_rate from clk ops Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:33 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk using factors clk with custom recalc Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun6i-ar100 using factors clk Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-01-27 17:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-31 16:59 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-02-05 13:03 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-02-02 15:55 ` [PATCH] clk: sunxi: don't mark sun6i_ar100_data __initconst Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-02 17:33 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-25 13:15 ` Chen-Yu Tsai [this message]
2016-01-27 17:49 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] clk: sunxi: rewrite sun8i-a23-mbus-clk using the simpler composite clk Maxime Ripard
2016-01-28 2:41 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-02-01 20:24 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 19:13 ` [PATCH RFC 00/11] clk: sunxi: factors clk clean up and refactor Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453727747-23307-12-git-send-email-wens@csie.org \
--to=wens@csie.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®