From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965015AbcAZKme (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 05:42:34 -0500 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.25]:34496 "EHLO lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964985AbcAZKll (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 05:41:41 -0500 Message-ID: <1453804890.17181.93.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator From: Paul Bolle To: John Crispin Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Chen Zhong , Matthias Brugger , Henry Chen , Steven Liu , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:41:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1453722989-41622-2-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> References: <1453722989-41622-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1453722989-41622-2-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John, On ma, 2016-01-25 at 12:56 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6323-regulator.c > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. This states this file is licensed GPL v2 only. > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); And, according to include/linux/module.h, this means "GNU Public License v2 or later". So I think there's a (subtle) mismatch between the license ident used for this driver and the comment above. Thanks, Paul Bolle