From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754824AbcA1GBG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:01:06 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:45310 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754465AbcA1GBE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:01:04 -0500 Message-ID: <1453960859.2322.58.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86 From: James Bottomley To: KY Srinivasan , Olaf Hering Cc: Haiyang Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:00:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1441706801-15300-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1443732718.6886.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20151002171415.GA30430@gmail.com> <20160125083514.GA11991@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 23:09 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Olaf Hering [mailto:olaf@aepfle.de] > > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:35 AM > > To: James Bottomley > > Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang > > ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > scsi@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86 > > > > On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) > > > > > > > Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86, > > > > but > > > > still). Can you make the define check CONFIG_32BIT rather than > > > > CONFIG_X86_32? > > > > > > According to arch/x86/Kconfig there is no such thing. > > > > What is the status of this change? Looks like there is nothing more > > to do on my side. > > Olaf, > > We do have the config option: CONFIG_X86_64. Perhaps we could use > this. Could you resubmit the patch with this change. It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit width config. James