From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755665AbcBJBAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:00:40 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:37209 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753107AbcBJBAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:00:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1455066026.2654.5.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.77-rc1 review From: Ben Hutchings To: Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Phil Jensen , akpm@linux-foundation.org Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:00:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <56B963D5.7020206@roeck-us.net> References: <56B963D5.7020206@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uFyboQJCe5WQ9y2+uxAK" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:a11:96ff:fe28:a980 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-uFyboQJCe5WQ9y2+uxAK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 19:58 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.77 release. > > There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one.=C2=A0=C2=A0If anyone has any issues with these being appli= ed, please > > let me know. > >=20 > > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 10 23:53:50 UTC 2016. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >=20 > Build results: > total: 93 pass: 93 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 58 pass: 58 fail: 0 >=20 > Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. Thanks for checking. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. - Donald Knuth --=-uFyboQJCe5WQ9y2+uxAK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUAVrqLque/yOyVhhEJAQrGvg/9GVv+bSO+sBejWhqEwdu4fADElEsJxCpb Aas9n0jKI1yfv4Q3o+2ayyz8amqV6CSdBh9TTaW1ac0jLhpJp8jDqbsncZJb0zE/ klivp/TzZ5SzQ+B/JgLmEb20LtBXr4ikPSd9OETuNs9Nv28hee3NK+WWNUoe2lf7 Sb+EU9kmIhXIe3oEBzkIu+nb1w4B3fSrrreU677tII+/txXrCQeCUu/YcDY29gz/ 351R2eGdJilYDI0bNycjxHq+2p6xhj9h3jV+mlS6if1uOry9FexIaFFPTTGB5+cP hA5kYIaAAHSE09D4gqTzZYHqn514SM1JLUvFE6j57tczrOG0oxriqfESlv72RmMH f0NzDKHyLXoR/EgfEJ/aljpvPsZhickMTiNrqkoRVUbDoQ1Wens5zaAyvODMNQ7V DdAL/Pfz4X+3iZThrgE4FH8Wi76bnXap3ps1n4dHcSUMWmKY/LsVEhMZBwHIqn8M gmEyP0BrNHFcV+jCUrFU9jecG0NaFqfbmSCAp+hI5NbteXhtQcw9ydiefoUh9LL5 G/S9HYADQXeNw+ZRncnA3ES6uxdFgKR4mxefRcgjLVTlgnu1Erj806C4Xu2n51qI VCPvPB8W8Lj2R2nwxP1p5tnjYH6U5Z3WnEAuTx1AtpyvKrchy/y+AK1XsXU4Sup1 zK15sBe8bHw= =nqyl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uFyboQJCe5WQ9y2+uxAK--