mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] lockdep: LOCKED_ACCESS: Maintain the keys of acqchains
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:57:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455602265-16490-4-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455602265-16490-1-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Add held_lock::prev_acqchain_key and task_struct::curr_acqchain_key to
maintain the keys of acqchains as the same as what lockdep does for
keys of lock classes.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |  3 +++
 include/linux/sched.h    |  3 +++
 kernel/fork.c            |  3 +++
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 140c1c3..2ffe6c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -244,6 +244,9 @@ struct held_lock {
 	 * with zero), here we store the previous hash value:
 	 */
 	u64				prev_chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	u64				prev_acqchain_key;
+#endif
 	unsigned long			acquire_ip;
 	struct lockdep_map		*instance;
 	struct lockdep_map		*nest_lock;
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a10494a..c24348e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1643,6 +1643,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned int lockdep_recursion;
 	struct held_lock held_locks[MAX_LOCK_DEPTH];
 	gfp_t lockdep_reclaim_gfp;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	u64 curr_acqchain_key;
+#endif
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN
 	unsigned int in_ubsan;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 2e391c7..d9fc51b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1404,6 +1404,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	p->lockdep_depth = 0; /* no locks held yet */
 	p->curr_chain_key = 0;
 	p->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+# ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	p->curr_acqchain_key = 0;
+# endif
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index fdb1b8c..3ebd00d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3089,6 +3089,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 	int chain_head = 0;
 	int class_idx;
 	u64 chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	u64 acqchain_key;
+#endif
 
 	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
 		return 0;
@@ -3196,6 +3199,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 		return 0;
 
 	chain_key = curr->curr_chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	acqchain_key = curr->curr_acqchain_key;
+#endif
 	if (!depth) {
 		/*
 		 * How can we have a chain hash when we ain't got no keys?!
@@ -3206,12 +3212,23 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 	}
 
 	hlock->prev_chain_key = chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	hlock->prev_acqchain_key = acqchain_key;
+#endif
 	if (separate_irq_context(curr, hlock)) {
 		chain_key = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+		acqchain_key = 0;
+#endif
+
 		chain_head = 1;
 	}
 	chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, id);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	acqchain_key = iterate_acqchain_key(acqchain_key, ip);
+#endif
 	if (nest_lock && !__lock_is_held(nest_lock))
 		return print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(curr, hlock, ip);
 
@@ -3219,6 +3236,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 		return 0;
 
 	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	curr->curr_acqchain_key = acqchain_key;
+#endif
 	curr->lockdep_depth++;
 	check_chain_key(curr);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
@@ -3348,6 +3368,9 @@ found_it:
 
 	curr->lockdep_depth = i;
 	curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	curr->curr_acqchain_key = hlock->prev_acqchain_key;
+#endif
 
 	for (; i < depth; i++) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
@@ -3438,6 +3461,9 @@ found_it:
 
 	curr->lockdep_depth = i;
 	curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	curr->curr_acqchain_key = hlock->prev_acqchain_key;
+#endif
 
 	for (i++; i < depth; i++) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
@@ -3879,6 +3905,11 @@ void lockdep_reset(void)
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	current->curr_chain_key = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKED_ACCESS
+	current->curr_acqchain_key = 0;
+#endif
+
 	current->lockdep_depth = 0;
 	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
 	memset(current->held_locks, 0, MAX_LOCK_DEPTH*sizeof(struct held_lock));
-- 
2.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-16  5:57 [RFC v2 0/6] Track RCU dereferences in RCU read-side critical sections Boqun Feng
2016-02-16  5:57 ` [RFC v2 1/6] lockdep: Add helper functions of irq_context Boqun Feng
2016-02-17  0:17   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-23 12:53   ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/lockdep: Fix ->irq_context calculation tip-bot for Boqun Feng
2016-02-16  5:57 ` [RFC v2 2/6] lockdep: LOCKED_ACCESS: Introduce locked access class and acqchain Boqun Feng
2016-02-16  5:57 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2016-02-16  5:57 ` [RFC v2 4/6] lockdep: LOCKED_ACCESS: Introduce locked_access_point() Boqun Feng
2016-02-16  5:57 ` [RFC v2 5/6] lockdep: LOCKED_ACCESS: Add proc interface for locked access class Boqun Feng
2016-02-16  5:57 ` [RFC v2 6/6] RCU: Track rcu_dereference() in RCU read-side critical section Boqun Feng
2016-02-25 14:32 ` [RFC v2 0/6] Track RCU dereferences in RCU read-side critical sections Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 15:37   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-26  3:06     ` Boqun Feng
2016-02-26 11:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-29  1:12         ` Boqun Feng
2016-02-29 12:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01  9:32             ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-01  9:57               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 10:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02  6:37                   ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-02 10:18                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 14:08                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1455602265-16490-4-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome