From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: avoid uninitialized variable warning
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:53:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456178006-1619105-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
With CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_PREEMPT both disabled, gcc decides
to partially inline the get_state_failrec() function but cannot
figure out that means the failrec pointer is always valid
if the function returns success, which causes a harmless
warning:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'clean_io_failure':
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2131:4: error: 'failrec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This marks get_state_failrec() and set_state_failrec() both
as 'noinline', which avoids the warning in all cases for me,
and seems less ugly than adding a fake initialization.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 47dc196ae719 ("btrfs: use proper type for failrec in extent_state")
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 27577f1b10dc..76a0c8597d98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ out:
* set the private field for a given byte offset in the tree. If there isn't
* an extent_state there already, this does nothing.
*/
-static int set_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
+static noinline int set_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
struct io_failure_record *failrec)
{
struct rb_node *node;
@@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static int get_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
+static noinline int get_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
struct io_failure_record **failrec)
{
struct rb_node *node;
--
2.7.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 21:53 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-23 11:40 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456178006-1619105-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®