mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: avoid uninitialized variable warning
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:53:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456178006-1619105-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)

With CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_PREEMPT both disabled, gcc decides
to partially inline the get_state_failrec() function but cannot
figure out that means the failrec pointer is always valid
if the function returns success, which causes a harmless
warning:

fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'clean_io_failure':
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2131:4: error: 'failrec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

This marks get_state_failrec() and set_state_failrec() both
as 'noinline', which avoids the warning in all cases for me,
and seems less ugly than adding a fake initialization.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 47dc196ae719 ("btrfs: use proper type for failrec in extent_state")
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 27577f1b10dc..76a0c8597d98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1842,7 +1842,7 @@ out:
  * set the private field for a given byte offset in the tree.  If there isn't
  * an extent_state there already, this does nothing.
  */
-static int set_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
+static noinline int set_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
 		struct io_failure_record *failrec)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node;
@@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int get_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
+static noinline int get_state_failrec(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
 		struct io_failure_record **failrec)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node;
-- 
2.7.0

             reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 21:53 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-23 11:40 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1456178006-1619105-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®