mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kai.huang@linux.intel.com,
	jike.song@intel.com,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:51:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456307476-46398-9-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456307476-46398-1-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>

Notifier list is introduced so that any node wants to receive the track
event can register to the list

Two APIs are introduced here:
- kvm_page_track_register_notifier(): register the notifier to receive
  track event

- kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(): stop receiving track event by
  unregister the notifier

The callback, node->track_write() is called when a write access on the
write tracked page happens

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c             | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |  4 ++
 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index e2fc5c0..eb68e6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 	 */
 	struct list_head active_mmu_pages;
 	struct list_head zapped_obsolete_pages;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head track_notifier_head;
 
 	struct list_head assigned_dev_head;
 	struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 5f16e28..c2b8d24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -6,6 +6,36 @@ enum kvm_page_track_mode {
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
 };
 
+/*
+ * The notifier represented by @kvm_page_track_notifier_node is linked into
+ * the head which will be notified when guest is triggering the track event.
+ *
+ * Write access on the head is protected by kvm->mmu_lock, read access
+ * is protected by track_srcu.
+ */
+struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head {
+	struct srcu_struct track_srcu;
+	struct hlist_head track_notifier_list;
+};
+
+struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
+	struct hlist_node node;
+
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
+	 * and write emulation is finished at that time.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the write access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address written by guest.
+	 * @new: the data was written to the address.
+	 * @bytes: the written length.
+	 */
+	void (*track_write)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+			    int bytes);
+};
+
+void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
+
 void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
 				 struct kvm_memory_slot *dont);
 int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
@@ -19,4 +49,13 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				     enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
 bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
 			      enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
+
+void
+kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+				 struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+void
+kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+			  int bytes);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
index f127f6d..11f7643 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
@@ -150,3 +150,73 @@ bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
 
 	return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
 }
+
+void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+	head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+	init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list);
+}
+
+/*
+ * register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest
+ * pages can be received.
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+				 struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+	head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of
+ * kvm_page_track_register_notifier().
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+	head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	hlist_del_rcu(&n->node);
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
+ * finished at this time.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
+ * interested in by itself.
+ */
+void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+			  int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+		if (n->track_write)
+			n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7b4cfea..b81c14e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4346,6 +4346,7 @@ int emulator_write_phys(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return 0;
 	kvm_mmu_pte_write(vcpu, gpa, val, bytes);
+	kvm_page_track_write(vcpu, gpa, val, bytes);
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -4604,6 +4605,7 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 
 	kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 	kvm_mmu_pte_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
+	kvm_page_track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
 
 	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
 
@@ -7724,6 +7726,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work, kvmclock_update_fn);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, kvmclock_sync_fn);
 
+	kvm_page_track_init(kvm);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-24 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-24  9:51 [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: rename has_wrprotected_page to mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: page track: add the framework of guest page tracking Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_slot_page_track_{add,remove}_page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: MMU: let page fault handler be aware tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: MMU: clear write-flooding on the fast path of " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-29 15:22   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_need_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24  9:51 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: apply page track notifier Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-24 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1456307476-46398-9-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jike.song@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®