From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756075AbcCNUdP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:33:15 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0164.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.164]:48624 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753263AbcCNUdM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:33:12 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1561:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3870:3872:4321:5007:6261:8531:10004:10400:10848:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: clam61_55c16ef6cc715 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1458 Message-ID: <1457987588.11972.135.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral From: Joe Perches To: Alexandre Belloni , Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:33:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160314201958.GB28277@piout.net> References: <1457982308-29848-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <1457982675.11972.119.camel@perches.com> <56E7119B.9060900@osg.samsung.com> <1457984317.11972.123.camel@perches.com> <56E71825.5070104@osg.samsung.com> <20160314201958.GB28277@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:19 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > checkpatch will not complain for messages but it will definitively > complain if they are not properly aligned:) checkpatch wouldn't actually complain unless the --strict option was used or these files were in drivers/net or drivers/staging.