From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Alex Ng <alexng@microsoft.com>, Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: handle various crash scenarios
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:33:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458304404-8347-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
Kdump keeps biting. Turns out CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is always
delivered to CPU0 regardless of what CPU we're sending CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD
from. vmbus_wait_for_unload() doesn't account for the fact that in case
we're crashing on some other CPU and CPU0 is still alive and operational
CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE will be delivered there completing
vmbus_connection.unload_event, our wait on the current CPU will never
end.
Do the following:
1) Check for completion_done() in the loop. In case interrupt handler is
still alive we'll get the confirmation we need.
2) Always read CPU0's message page as CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE will be
delivered there. We can race with still-alive interrupt handler doing
the same but we don't care as we're checking completion_done() now.
3) Cleanup message pages on all CPUs. This is required (at least for the
current CPU as we're clearing CPU0 messages now but we may want to bring
up additional CPUs on crash) as new messages won't be delivered till we
consume what's pending. On boot we'll place message pages somewhere else
and we won't be able to read stale messages.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
index b10e8f74..5f37057 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
@@ -512,14 +512,26 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel *channel, const uuid_le *type_gui
static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- void *page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[cpu];
+ int cpu;
+ void *page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[0];
struct hv_message *msg = (struct hv_message *)page_addr +
VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT;
struct vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr;
bool unloaded = false;
- while (1) {
+ /*
+ * CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE is always delivered to CPU0. When we're
+ * crashing on a different CPU let's hope that IRQ handler on CPU0 is
+ * still functional and vmbus_unload_response() will complete
+ * vmbus_connection.unload_event. If not, the last thing we can do is
+ * read message page for CPU0 regardless of what CPU we're on.
+ */
+ while (!unloaded) {
+ if (completion_done(&vmbus_connection.unload_event)) {
+ unloaded = true;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (READ_ONCE(msg->header.message_type) == HVMSG_NONE) {
mdelay(10);
continue;
@@ -530,9 +542,17 @@ static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
unloaded = true;
vmbus_signal_eom(msg);
+ }
- if (unloaded)
- break;
+ /*
+ * We're crashing and already got the UNLOAD_RESPONSE, cleanup all
+ * maybe-pending messages on all CPUs to be able to receive new
+ * messages after we reconnect.
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ page_addr = hv_context.synic_message_page[cpu];
+ msg = (struct hv_message *)page_addr + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT;
+ msg->header.message_type = HVMSG_NONE;
}
}
--
2.5.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 12:33 Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2016-03-18 15:20 ` Radim Krcmar
2016-03-18 15:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-18 16:11 ` Radim Krcmar
2016-03-18 18:02 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-03-21 7:51 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-21 22:44 ` KY Srinivasan
2016-03-22 9:47 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-22 14:00 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-22 14:18 ` KY Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458304404-8347-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=alexng@microsoft.com \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome