From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
lizefan@huawei.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/6] sched/fair: Add introduction to the sched load avg metrics
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 04:16:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459369015-28375-4-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459369015-28375-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
These sched metrics have become complex enough. We introduce them
at their definition.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 54784d0..db3c6e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1208,18 +1208,56 @@ struct load_weight {
};
/*
- * The load_avg/util_avg accumulates an infinite geometric series.
- * 1) load_avg factors frequency scaling into the amount of time that a
- * sched_entity is runnable on a rq into its weight. For cfs_rq, it is the
- * aggregated such weights of all runnable and blocked sched_entities.
- * 2) util_avg factors frequency and cpu capacity scaling into the amount of time
- * that a sched_entity is running on a CPU, in the range [0..SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE].
- * For cfs_rq, it is the aggregated such times of all runnable and
+ * The load_avg/util_avg accumulates an infinite geometric series
+ * (see __update_load_avg() in kernel/sched/fair.c).
+ *
+ * [load_avg definition]
+ *
+ * load_avg = runnable% * scale_load_down(load)
+ *
+ * where runnable% is the time ratio that a sched_entity is runnable.
+ * For cfs_rq, it is the aggregated such load_avg of all runnable and
* blocked sched_entities.
- * The 64 bit load_sum can:
- * 1) for cfs_rq, afford 4353082796 (=2^64/47742/88761) entities with
- * the highest weight (=88761) always runnable, we should not overflow
- * 2) for entity, support any load.weight always runnable
+ *
+ * load_avg may also take frequency scaling into account:
+ *
+ * load_avg = runnable% * scale_load_down(load) * freq%
+ *
+ * where freq% is the CPU frequency normalize to the highest frequency
+ *
+ * [util_avg definition]
+ *
+ * util_avg = running% * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
+ *
+ * where running% is the time ratio that a sched_entity is running on
+ * a CPU. For cfs_rq, it is the aggregated such util_avg of all runnable
+ * and blocked sched_entities.
+ *
+ * util_avg may also factor frequency scaling and CPU capacity scaling:
+ *
+ * util_avg = running% * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE * freq% * capacity%
+ *
+ * where freq% is the same as above, and capacity% is the CPU capacity
+ * normalized to the greatest capacity (due to uarch differences, etc).
+ *
+ * N.B., the above ratios (runnable%, running%, freq%, and capacity%)
+ * themselves are in the range of [0, 1]. To do fixed point arithmetic,
+ * we therefore scale them to as large range as necessary. This is for
+ * example reflected by util_avg's SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE.
+ *
+ * [Overflow issue]
+ *
+ * The 64bit load_sum can have 4353082796 (=2^64/47742/88761) entities
+ * with the highest load (=88761) always runnable on a single cfs_rq, we
+ * should not overflow as the number already hits PID_MAX_LIMIT.
+ *
+ * For all other cases (including 32bit kernel), struct load_weight's
+ * weight will overflow first before we do, because:
+ *
+ * Max(load_avg) <= Max(load.weight)
+ *
+ * Then, it is the load_weight's responsibility to consider overflow
+ * issues.
*/
struct sched_avg {
u64 last_update_time, load_sum;
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 20:16 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/6] sched/fair: Clean up sched metric definitions Yuyang Du
2016-03-30 20:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/6] sched/fair: Generalize the load/util averages resolution definition Yuyang Du
2016-03-30 20:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/6] sched/fair: Remove SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT and SCHED_LOAD_SCALE Yuyang Du
2016-03-30 20:16 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-03-30 20:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 4/6] sched/fair: Remove scale_load_down() for load_avg Yuyang Du
2016-03-31 17:45 ` bsegall
2016-03-30 20:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 5/6] sched/fair: Rename scale_load() and scale_load_down() Yuyang Du
2016-03-30 20:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 6/6] sched/fair: Remove unconditionally inactive code Yuyang Du
2016-03-31 17:53 ` bsegall
2016-03-31 23:20 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459369015-28375-4-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome