mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Optimize tick periodic cpu load updates
Date: Fri,  1 Apr 2016 15:23:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459516987-15745-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459516987-15745-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Don't bother with the whole pending tickless cpu load machinery if
we run a tick periodic kernel. That's less job for the CPU on ticks.

Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 394f008..1bb053e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4526,7 +4526,7 @@ decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx)
  * see decay_load_misses(). For NOHZ_FULL we get to subtract and add the extra
  * term. See the @active paramter.
  */
-static void __cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
+static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
 			      unsigned long pending_updates)
 {
 	unsigned long tickless_load = this_rq->cpu_load[0];
@@ -4567,24 +4567,6 @@ static void __cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
 	sched_avg_update(this_rq);
 }
 
-static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq,
-			    unsigned long curr_jiffies,
-			    unsigned long load)
-{
-	unsigned long pending_updates;
-
-	pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
-	if (pending_updates) {
-		this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
-		/*
-		 * In the regular NOHZ case, we were idle, this means load 0.
-		 * In the NOHZ_FULL case, we were non-idle, we should consider
-		 * its weighted load.
-		 */
-		__cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
-	}
-}
-
 /* Used instead of source_load when we know the type == 0 */
 static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 {
@@ -4592,6 +4574,18 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+static unsigned long cpu_load_pending(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
+	unsigned long pending_updates;
+
+	pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
+	if (pending_updates)
+		this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
+
+	return pending_updates;
+}
+
 /*
  * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the
  * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading
@@ -4617,7 +4611,7 @@ static void cpu_load_update_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
 	if (weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)))
 		return;
 
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), 0);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, 0, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4641,18 +4635,23 @@ void cpu_load_update_nohz_start(void)
  */
 void cpu_load_update_nohz_stop(void)
 {
-	unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
 	struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
 	unsigned long load;
 
-	if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
+	if (jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
 		return;
 
 	load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq));
+
 	raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, curr_jiffies, load);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 	raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
+static inline unsigned long cpu_load_pending(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 
 /*
@@ -4662,7 +4661,7 @@ void cpu_load_update_active(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
 	unsigned long load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq));
 
-	cpu_load_update(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), load);
+	cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, cpu_load_pending(this_rq));
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1802013..d951701 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -585,8 +585,10 @@ struct rq {
 #endif
 	#define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
 	unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	unsigned long last_load_update_tick;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+# endif
 	u64 nohz_stamp;
 	unsigned long nohz_flags;
 #endif
-- 
2.7.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01 13:23 [PATCH 0/4] sched: Fix/improve nohz " Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-01 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Gather cpu load functions under a common namespace Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-02  7:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-02 12:28     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-01 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Correctly handle nohz ticks cpu load accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-02  7:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-02 12:32     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-01 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2016-04-02  7:23   ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Optimize tick periodic cpu load updates Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-02 12:38     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-01 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Conditionally build cpu load decay code for nohz Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-02  7:23   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459516987-15745-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®