From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
To: <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
<t-kristo@ti.com>, <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Fix pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry to use __ffs than ffs
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:29:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460609956-26539-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> (raw)
pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry uses ffs which gives bit indices
ranging from 1 to MAX. This leads to a corner case where we try to request
the pin number = MAX and fails.
bit_pos value is being calculted using ffs. pin_num_from_lsb uses
bit_pos value. pins array is populated with:
pin + pin_num_from_lsb.
The above is 1 more than usual bit indices as bit_pos uses ffs to compute
first set bit. Hence the last of the pins array is populated with the MAX
value and not MAX - 1 which causes error when we call pin_request.
mask_pos is rightly calculated as ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1))
Consequently val_pos and submask are correct.
Hence use __ffs which gives (ffs(x) - 1) as the first bit set.
fixes: 4e7e8017a8 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules")
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Changed pcs->fshift to use __ffs instead of ffs to be consistent.
Boot tesed on da850-evm and checked the pinctrl sysfs nodes.
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index fb126d5..cf9bafa 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
/* Parse pins in each row from LSB */
while (mask) {
- bit_pos = ffs(mask);
+ bit_pos = __ffs(mask);
pin_num_from_lsb = bit_pos / pcs->bits_per_pin;
- mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1));
+ mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << bit_pos);
val_pos = val & mask_pos;
submask = mask & mask_pos;
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "pinctrl-single,function-mask",
&pcs->fmask);
if (!ret) {
- pcs->fshift = ffs(pcs->fmask) - 1;
+ pcs->fshift = __ffs(pcs->fmask);
pcs->fmax = pcs->fmask >> pcs->fshift;
} else {
/* If mask property doesn't exist, function mux is invalid. */
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 4:59 Keerthy [this message]
2016-04-14 16:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-15 9:27 ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-15 15:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-23 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-26 16:17 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460609956-26539-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com \
--to=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®