From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix a bug in dl_overflow()
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:19:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460636368-1993-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> (raw)
I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests.
# grep dl /proc/sched_debug
dl_rq[0]:
.dl_nr_running : 0
.dl_bw->bw : 996147
.dl_bw->total_bw : -222297900
Something unusual must have happened.
After some digging, I finally noticed that when changing a deadline
task to normal(cfs), and changing it back to deadline immediately,
after it died, we will got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.
The root cause is in dl_overflow(), it has:
if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
return 0;
1) When a deadline task is changed to !deadline task, it will start
dl timer in switched_from_dl(), and retain previous deadline parameter
till the timer expires.
2) If we change it back to deadline with the same bandwidth parameter
before the timer expires, as it keeps the old bandwidth although it
is not a deadline task. dl_overflow() simply returns success without
updating the right data, and got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.
The solution is simple, if @p is not deadline, don't return.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 4a2c79d..5988fee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2378,7 +2378,8 @@ static int dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period, runtime) : 0;
int cpus, err = -1;
- if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
+ /* !deadline task may carry old deadline bandwidth */
+ if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw && task_has_dl_policy(p))
return 0;
/*
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 12:19 Xunlei Pang [this message]
2016-04-15 7:07 ` Juri Lelli
2016-04-15 8:13 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-04-23 12:59 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460636368-1993-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com \
--to=xlpang@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome