From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: acme@kernel.org
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/bench-futex: Simplify wrapper for LOCK_PI
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:14:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461208447-29328-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
Given that the 'val' parameter is ignored for FUTEX_LOCK_PI,
get rid of the bogus deadlock detection flag in the wrapper
code and avoid the extra argument, making it resemble its unlock
counterpart. And if nothing else, we already only pass 0 anyway.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/bench/futex.h | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c b/tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c
index 6a18ce21f865..6952db65508a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/futex-lock-pi.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void *workerfn(void *arg)
do {
int ret;
again:
- ret = futex_lock_pi(w->futex, NULL, 0, futex_flag);
+ ret = futex_lock_pi(w->futex, NULL, futex_flag);
if (ret) { /* handle lock acquisition */
if (!silent)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/futex.h b/tools/perf/bench/futex.h
index aca900fdc788..f0501edba0e7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/futex.h
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/futex.h
@@ -57,13 +57,11 @@ futex_wake(u_int32_t *uaddr, int nr_wake, int opflags)
/**
* futex_lock_pi() - block on uaddr as a PI mutex
- * @detect: whether (1) or not (0) to perform deadlock detection
*/
static inline int
-futex_lock_pi(u_int32_t *uaddr, struct timespec *timeout, int detect,
- int opflags)
+futex_lock_pi(u_int32_t *uaddr, struct timespec *timeout, int opflags)
{
- return futex(uaddr, FUTEX_LOCK_PI, detect, timeout, NULL, 0, opflags);
+ return futex(uaddr, FUTEX_LOCK_PI, 0, timeout, NULL, 0, opflags);
}
/**
--
2.8.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 3:14 Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2016-04-25 23:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-27 15:33 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench futex: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461208447-29328-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®