From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:37:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461926262-24732-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the
static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case
of cpumask) that are created from DT.
However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some
different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be
removed using above functions.
This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table
to support the above mentioned usecase.
This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/pm_opp.h | 10 ++++++++
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
v1->v2:
- Instead of renaming OF versions, created non-OF versions of
dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table as suggested by Viresh
v2->v3:
- updated all the errors in documentation and changed to use
remove_all rather than remove_dyn(suggested by Viresh)
- Added Viresh's ACK on both the patches
- Rebased on linux-pm/bleeding-edge as there was a conflict
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
index 433b60092972..15536d45832a 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
@@ -1845,21 +1845,11 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head *dev_pm_opp_get_notifier(struct device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_notifier);
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
/**
- * dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT
- * entries
- * @dev: device pointer used to lookup OPP table.
- *
- * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT.
- *
- * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
- * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
- * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
- * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
- * mutex cannot be locked.
+ * Free OPPs either created using static entries present in DT or even the
+ * dynamically added entries based on remove_all param.
*/
-void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
+static void _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(struct device *dev, bool remove_all)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp;
@@ -1884,7 +1874,7 @@ void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
if (list_is_singular(&opp_table->dev_list)) {
/* Free static OPPs */
list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
- if (!opp->dynamic)
+ if (remove_all || !opp->dynamic)
_opp_remove(opp_table, opp, true);
}
} else {
@@ -1894,6 +1884,44 @@ void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&opp_table_lock);
}
+
+/**
+ * dev_pm_opp_remove_table() - Free all OPPs associated with the device
+ * @dev: device pointer used to lookup OPP table.
+ *
+ * Free both OPPs created using static entries present in DT and the
+ * dynamically added entries.
+ *
+ * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
+ * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
+ * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
+ * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
+ * mutex cannot be locked.
+ */
+void dev_pm_opp_remove_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+ _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(dev, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove_table);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+/**
+ * dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT
+ * entries
+ * @dev: device pointer used to lookup OPP table.
+ *
+ * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT.
+ *
+ * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
+ * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
+ * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
+ * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
+ * mutex cannot be locked.
+ */
+void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+ _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(dev, false);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table);
/* Returns opp descriptor node for a device, caller must do of_node_put() */
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
index 3428380dfca7..7aff8d8a62c2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
@@ -119,20 +119,7 @@ void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table);
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-/**
- * dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() - Removes OPP table for @cpumask
- * @cpumask: cpumask for which OPP table needs to be removed
- *
- * This removes the OPP tables for CPUs present in the @cpumask.
- *
- * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
- * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
- * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
- * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
- * mutex cannot be locked.
- */
-void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
+static void _dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask, bool of)
{
struct device *cpu_dev;
int cpu;
@@ -147,9 +134,51 @@ void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
continue;
}
- dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(cpu_dev);
+ if (of)
+ dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(cpu_dev);
+ else
+ dev_pm_opp_remove_table(cpu_dev);
}
}
+
+/**
+ * dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table() - Removes OPP table for @cpumask
+ * @cpumask: cpumask for which OPP table needs to be removed
+ *
+ * This removes the OPP tables for CPUs present in the @cpumask.
+ * This should be used to remove all the OPPs entries associated with
+ * the cpus in @cpumask.
+ *
+ * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
+ * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
+ * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
+ * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
+ * mutex cannot be locked.
+ */
+void dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
+{
+ _dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask, false);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+/**
+ * dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() - Removes OPP table for @cpumask
+ * @cpumask: cpumask for which OPP table needs to be removed
+ *
+ * This removes the OPP tables for CPUs present in the @cpumask.
+ * This should be used only to remove static entries created from DT.
+ *
+ * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
+ * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
+ * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
+ * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
+ * mutex cannot be locked.
+ */
+void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
+{
+ _dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask, true);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table);
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
index 15f554443b59..5d3bde4ca9a9 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ void dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(struct device *dev);
int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq);
int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, const cpumask_var_t cpumask);
int dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask);
+void dev_pm_opp_remove_table(struct device *dev);
+void dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
#else
static inline unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
{
@@ -190,6 +192,14 @@ static inline int dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_va
return -EINVAL;
}
+static inline void dev_pm_opp_remove_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_OPP */
#if defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP) && defined(CONFIG_OF)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 10:37 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-04-29 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: arm_big_little: use generic OPP functions for {init,free}_opp_table Sudeep Holla
2016-05-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table Stephen Boyd
2016-05-03 10:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-03 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 " Sudeep Holla
2016-05-03 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: arm_big_little: use generic OPP functions for {init,free}_opp_table Sudeep Holla
2016-05-03 18:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table Stephen Boyd
2016-05-05 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461926262-24732-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®