From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] kernel: Add noaudit variant of ns_capable()
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 18:04:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462575854-4301-2-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462575854-4301-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com>
When checking the current cred for a capability in a specific user
namespace, it isn't always desirable to have the LSMs audit the check.
This patch adds a noaudit variant of ns_capable() for when those
situations arise.
The common logic between ns_capable() and the new ns_capable_noaudit()
is moved into a single, shared function to keep duplicated code to a
minimum and ease maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/capability.h | 5 +++++
kernel/capability.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index 00690ff..5f3c63d 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ extern bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t,
struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
extern bool capable(int cap);
extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
+extern bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
#else
static inline bool has_capability(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
{
@@ -233,6 +234,10 @@ static inline bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
{
return true;
}
+static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */
extern bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap);
extern bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 45432b5..00411c8 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -361,6 +361,24 @@ bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
return has_ns_capability_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
}
+static bool ns_capable_common(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, bool audit)
+{
+ int capable;
+
+ if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
+ pr_crit("capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
+ BUG();
+ }
+
+ capable = audit ? security_capable(current_cred(), ns, cap) :
+ security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), ns, cap);
+ if (capable == 0) {
+ current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* ns_capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
* @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in
@@ -374,19 +392,27 @@ bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
*/
bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
{
- if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
- pr_crit("capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
- BUG();
- }
-
- if (security_capable(current_cred(), ns, cap) == 0) {
- current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
+/**
+ * ns_capable_noaudit - Determine if the current task has a superior capability
+ * (unaudited) in effect
+ * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
+ *
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ */
+bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
+ return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, false);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_noaudit);
/**
* capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-06 23:04 [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl Tyler Hicks
2016-05-06 23:04 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2016-05-09 4:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel: Add noaudit variant of ns_capable() Serge Hallyn
2016-05-06 23:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: Use ns_capable_noaudit() when determining net sysctl permissions Tyler Hicks
2016-05-09 4:24 ` Serge Hallyn
2016-05-09 3:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl David Miller
2016-05-17 14:13 ` Tyler Hicks
2016-06-02 16:30 ` Tyler Hicks
2016-06-03 1:00 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462575854-4301-2-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com \
--to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®