Re: rc7 + tip/master suspend fun

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Monday, July 28, 2014 11:02:09 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, July 28, 2014 07:53:26 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > 
> > > --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > > Content-Disposition: inline
> > > 
> > > Hi guys,
> > > 
> > > so during my rc7 + tip/master testing today, I've hit the second WARN
> > > in remove_proc_entry, see attached pic. This happens right before I
> > > suspend to disk and I can't successfully suspend because sda gets choked
> > > afterwards and floods dmesg with something-has-timeout messages which I
> > > can't read - whizzing by too fast.
> > > 
> > > And this seems consistent with the warning because sda1 is behind AHCI
> > > for which the warning is for.
> > > 
> > > Oh, and I'm saying it is tip/master-related because plain rc7 is fine.
> > > 
> > > Other strange things I was able to observe in dmesg between plain rc7
> > > and rc7+tip/master are that something in the interrupts allocation is
> > > different now (plenty of movement in that area recently) leading to the
> > > following diffs between dmesg:
> > > 
> > > --- 16-rc7	2014-07-28 19:43:13.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ 16-rc7+	2014-07-28 11:11:24.000000000 +0200
> > > 
> > > @@ -137,11 +138,9 @@ IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 10, version 33, addre
> > >  ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
> > >  ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)
> > >  ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> > > -ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
> > >  ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> > >  Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
> > >  smpboot: Allowing 8 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> > > -nr_irqs_gsi: 72
> > >  PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x0009e000-0x0009efff]
> > >  PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x0009f000-0x0009ffff]
> > >  PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x000a0000-0x000dffff]
> > > 
> > > that gsi thing went away, apparently.
> > > 
> > > -NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:1288 16
> > > +NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:1032 0
> > > 
> > > fun.
> 
> Right, that's from Jiangs ioapic rework.
>  
> > > And then something lead to different interrupts being assigned:
> > > 
> > > -pci 0000:00:00.2: irq 72 for MSI/MSI-X
> > > +pci 0000:00:00.2: irq 27 for MSI/MSI-X
> > > 
> > > -ahci 0000:04:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X
> > > +ahci 0000:04:00.0: irq 29 for MSI/MSI-X
> 
> Borislav, can you please upload a full bootlog with "apic=verbose" on
> the commandline?
> 
> Jiang, can you please have a look?
>  
> > > and lookie lookie, it is ahci which changes IRQ lines.
> > > 
> > > Suggestions and ideas how to narrow down are appreciated.
> > 
> > Please try to revert this patch from Peter:
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140620918218199
> 
> How is that related to a leaked interrupt handler? That patch gives a
> splat at request_irq() time. Completely unrelated to this problem.

Right, sorry for the noise.

Rafael