From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
Lejun Zhu <lejun.zhu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Input - soc_button_array: make sure one GPIO is not assigned twice
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462894673-26560-4-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462894673-26560-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
The Surface 3 declares twice the GPIO as GpioInt and GpioIo in its
ACPI table. Given that we do not keep the gpiod around, but the actual
number associated to, there is a chance while enumerating the GPIOs that
one gets assigned twice. Make sure a previous button has not been mapped
already to the current button to prevent such failure.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
index 70002a3..f2f75cf 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ soc_button_device_create(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct gpio_keys_platform_data *gpio_keys_pdata;
int n_buttons = 0;
int gpio;
- int error;
+ int i, error;
gpio_keys_pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
sizeof(*gpio_keys_pdata) +
@@ -96,6 +96,13 @@ soc_button_device_create(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (gpio_is_valid(gpio))
continue;
+ for (i = 0; i < n_buttons; i++) {
+ if (gpio_keys[i].gpio == gpio)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (i < n_buttons)
+ continue; /* the GPIO has already been assigned */
+
gpio_keys[n_buttons].type = info->event_type;
gpio_keys[n_buttons].code = info->event_code;
gpio_keys[n_buttons].gpio = gpio;
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 15:37 [PATCH 0/3] Input: soc_button_array fixes and question Benjamin Tissoires
2016-05-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] Input - soc_button_array: use gpio_is_valid() Benjamin Tissoires
2016-05-10 15:56 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-05-10 16:33 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2016-05-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] Input - soc_button_array: bail out earlier if gpiod_count is null Benjamin Tissoires
2016-05-10 15:37 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2016-05-13 15:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] Input: soc_button_array fixes and question Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462894673-26560-4-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=lejun.zhu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®