From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch from modules
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:30:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463146234-161304-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The introduction of switch_mm_irqs_off() brought back an old bug
regarding the use of preempt_enable_no_resched:
As part of 62b94a08da1b ("sched/preempt: Take away
preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules"), the definition of
preempt_enable_no_resched() is only available in built-in code,
not in loadable modules, so we can't generally use it from header
files. However, the ARM version of finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
calls preempt_enable_no_resched() and is defined as a static
inline function in asm/mmu_context.h. This in turn means we cannot
include asm/mmu_context.h from modules.
With today's tip tree, asm/mmu_context.h gets included from
linux/mmu_context.h, which is normally the exact pattern one would
expect, but unfortunately, linux/mmu_context.h can be included from
the vhost driver that is a loadable module, now causing this compile
time error:
In file included from ../include/linux/mmu_context.h:4:0,
from ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:18:
../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'finish_arch_post_lock_switch':
../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h:88:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_enable_no_resched' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
preempt_enable_no_resched();
Andy already tried to fix the bug by including linux/preempt.h
from asm/mmu_context.h, but that didn't help. I suggested reordering
the header files, which wasn't popular, but Steve came up with this
workaround instead:
The finish_arch_post_lock_switch() definition is now also hidden
inside of #ifdef MODULE, so we don't see anything referencing
preempt_enable_no_resched() from a header file. I've built a
few hundred randconfig kernels with this, and did not see any
new problems.
Fixes: f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index ed73babc0dc9..3cc14dd8587c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
}
+#ifndef MODULE
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
finish_arch_post_lock_switch
static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
preempt_enable_no_resched();
}
}
+#endif /* !MODULE */
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
--
2.7.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-13 13:30 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-05-13 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [tip:sched/core] ARM: Hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch() " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463146234-161304-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®