From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933410AbcEQBqr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 21:46:47 -0400 Received: from smtp2203-239.mail.aliyun.com ([121.197.203.239]:57500 "EHLO smtp2203-239.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932353AbcEQBqn (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 21:46:43 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 324 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 21:46:43 EDT X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE;BC=-0.004152935|-1;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e02c03293;MF=lip@dtdream.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;RT=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_----4pCMAnT_1463449244; From: Li Peng To: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Peng Subject: [PATCH] mm/slub.c: fix sysfs filename in comment Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:40:42 +0800 Message-Id: <1463449242-5366-1-git-send-email-lip@dtdream.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org /sys/kernel/slab/xx/defrag_ratio should be remote_node_defrag_ratio. Signed-off-by: Li Peng --- mm/slub.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 4dbb109e..6ef1540 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -1735,11 +1735,11 @@ static void *get_any_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, * may return off node objects because partial slabs are obtained * from other nodes and filled up. * - * If /sys/kernel/slab/xx/defrag_ratio is set to 100 (which makes - * defrag_ratio = 1000) then every (well almost) allocation will - * first attempt to defrag slab caches on other nodes. This means - * scanning over all nodes to look for partial slabs which may be - * expensive if we do it every time we are trying to find a slab + * If /sys/kernel/slab/xx/remote_node_defrag_ratio is set to 100 + * (which makes defrag_ratio = 1000) then every (well almost) + * allocation will first attempt to defrag slab caches on other nodes. + * This means scanning over all nodes to look for partial slabs which + * may be expensive if we do it every time we are trying to find a slab * with available objects. */ if (!s->remote_node_defrag_ratio || -- 1.8.3.1