From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932208AbcE0BgB (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2016 21:36:01 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0178.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.178]:38367 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755823AbcE0BgA (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2016 21:36:00 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:371:372:379:541:599:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:4321:4362:5007:8603:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11473:11658:11783:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:14659:14721:21080:30054:30064:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: stamp46_8b53247cbcb21 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2174 Message-ID: <1464312955.16344.55.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use the correct size to set block max sectors From: Joe Perches To: Long Li , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: KY Srinivasan , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:35:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1464307708-4315-1-git-send-email-longli@microsoft.com> References: <1464307708-4315-1-git-send-email-longli@microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dOn Thu, 2016-05-26 at 17:08 -0700, Long Li wrote: > The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. Thanks. The patch subject should use something like: [PATCH] sd: Use the correct size to set block max sectors to show what subsystem is being modified. > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c [] > @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) >   if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && >       sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && >       sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && > -     sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) > - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = > +     sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { > + q->limits.io_opt = >   sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; > + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); > + } >   else >   rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; And style trivia:  it'd be more kernel style consistent as: if (...   sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { q->limits.io_opt = sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; rw_max = q->limits.io_opt >> 9; } else { rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; } ie: no parentheses necessary around the shifted value and   braces around both arms.